Executive Summary
Wichita's housing market shows average risk, ranking 77th of 273 metros. The market recently entered Recovery. Inventory is growing moderately (-12% YoY) with stable liquidity. Early signs of stabilization — conditions may favor patient buyers.
Wichita experienced a market correction from late 2024 through early 2025. The market is currently recovering.
Inventory is declining (-12% YoY), indicating a tight market with limited supply.
Rent growth is roughly keeping pace with price appreciation, suggesting valuations are not stretched.
Cycle Phase
Market conditions are rebuilding after a correction period
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by permit growth and migration, while employment provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory is declining (-12% YoY), indicating a tight market with limited supply.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Healthy recovery. Credit is flowing normally and transactions are steady — conditions favor continued rebuilding.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
SurgeRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Permit activity is surging and demand is absorbing it. Both sides of the market are running hot — monitor for overheating if liquidity shifts.
Employment Concentration
Employment
ConcentratedInternal Structure
Wichita's 4 counties show moderate divergence — Sedgwick County carries the most risk (High Risk) while Butler County anchors the lower end.
Wichita, KS shows Moderate internal divergence — some counties diverge meaningfully from the metro picture. Sedgwick County contributes the most structural risk (High Risk, driven by permit growth), while Butler County anchors the lower end (Below Average).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Sedgwick CountyRisk Driver | 83 |
Harvey County | 58 |
Butler CountyStabilizer | 42 |
Sumner County<5% | 17 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2026-06 | 59 |
| 2025-12 | 53 |
| 2025-09 | 49 |
| 2025-07 | 48 |
| 2025-04 | 48 |
| 2025-02 | 53 |
| 2024-12 | 49 |
| 2024-11 | 45 |
| 2024-09 | 43 |
| 2024-07 | 45 |
| 2024-06 | 46 |
| 2024-04 | 46 |
| 2024-01 | 50 |
| 2023-11 | 52 |
| 2023-10 | 52 |
| 2023-08 | 48 |
| 2023-07 | 48 |
| 2023-05 | 44 |
| 2023-03 | 41 |
| 2023-01 | 43 |
| 2022-10 | 45 |
| 2022-08 | 50 |
| 2022-07 | 46 |
| 2022-05 | 46 |
| 2022-02 | 43 |
| 2022-01 | 44 |
| 2021-11 | 40 |
| 2021-09 | 44 |
| 2021-07 | 45 |
| 2021-04 | 48 |
| 2021-02 | 47 |
| 2020-12 | 52 |
| 2020-10 | 53 |
| 2020-08 | 53 |
| 2020-06 | 53 |
| 2020-04 | 46 |
| 2020-02 | 44 |
| 2020-01 | 43 |
| 2019-11 | 39 |
| 2019-10 | 39 |
| 2019-08 | 40 |
| 2019-07 | 37 |
| 2019-05 | 40 |
| 2019-03 | 36 |
| 2019-01 | 37 |