Tuscaloosa, AL
Cycle Phase
Tuscaloosa experienced a market correction from mid-2024 through late 2024. The market is currently recovering.
Market conditions are rebuilding after a correction period
Tuscaloosa's housing market shows average risk, ranking 203rd of 287 metros. The market recently entered Recovery. Inventory levels are elevated, warranting monitoring.
Executive Summary
Risk is Neutral, driven primarily by migration and affordability. The market is in Recovery phase. Liquidity is watch and valuation is balanced.
Top Risk Drivers (This Month)
Market Signals
Inventory is elevated (+19% YoY) and days on market are up +6% — supply is building but not yet at stress levels.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
Factor Breakdown
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
Underlying Values
| Metric | Value | Pctile |
|---|---|---|
| Price Momentum | +1.8% | p38 |
| Permit Growth | -13.8% | p29 |
| Permits/1K Pop | 2.18 | p25 |
| Affordability | 0.29 | p63 |
| Employment | +0.4% | p43 |
| Net AGI Migration | -$14K | p66 |
National ContextDoes not affect score
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Early-stage recovery with lingering transaction weakness. Credit is available but buyer activity hasn't fully returned yet.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local SignalsDoes not affect score
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
CoolingRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Both sides are decelerating. Broad market slowdown — builders and buyers are both pulling back simultaneously.
Liquidity
Liquidity
Internal Structure
Tuscaloosa's counties diverge significantly — Tuscaloosa County (High Risk) contrasts sharply with Hale County, making the metro average potentially misleading.
Tuscaloosa, AL shows High internal divergence — the metro composite may obscure significant county-level differences. Tuscaloosa County contributes the most structural risk (High Risk, driven by price momentum), while Hale County anchors the lower end (Below Average).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Tuscaloosa CountyRisk Driver | 83 |
Greene CountyUnscored | 50 |
Hale CountyStabilizer | 33 |
Pickens County | 33 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2025-11 | 42 |
| 2025-09 | 40 |
| 2025-08 | 47 |
| 2025-07 | 47 |
| 2025-05 | 53 |
| 2025-04 | 60 |
| 2025-02 | 54 |
| 2024-12 | 59 |
| 2024-10 | 60 |
| 2024-09 | 49 |
| 2024-08 | 42 |
| 2024-06 | 48 |
| 2024-04 | 41 |
| 2024-02 | 42 |
| 2023-12 | 44 |
| 2023-10 | 44 |
| 2023-09 | 40 |
| 2023-08 | 40 |
| 2023-06 | 40 |
| 2023-04 | 38 |
| 2023-02 | 39 |
| 2022-12 | 36 |
| 2022-11 | 38 |
| 2022-10 | 35 |
| 2022-08 | 38 |
| 2022-07 | 39 |
| 2022-05 | 42 |
| 2022-03 | 47 |
| 2022-02 | 47 |
| 2021-12 | 47 |
| 2021-09 | 49 |
| 2021-07 | 49 |
| 2021-06 | 48 |
| 2021-04 | 38 |
| 2021-03 | 50 |
| 2021-01 | 51 |
| 2020-10 | 58 |
| 2020-08 | 62 |
| 2020-06 | 63 |
| 2020-04 | 62 |
| 2020-03 | 44 |
| 2020-01 | 42 |
| 2019-10 | 36 |
| 2019-08 | 36 |
| 2019-06 | 38 |
| 2019-04 | 36 |
| 2019-03 | 38 |
| 2019-01 | 38 |