Tuscaloosa, AL
Executive Summary
Tuscaloosa's housing market shows below-average risk, ranking 226th of 273 metros. The market recently entered Hypersupply. The market shows signs of liquidity stress with elevated inventory. Significant oversupply — conditions increasingly favor buyers over sellers.
Tuscaloosa experienced a market correction from mid-2026 through mid-2026. Elevated inventory persists, suggesting the market hasn't fully normalized.
Inventory has surged +26% YoY with days on market up +14% — significant supply buildup indicating market stress.
Rent growth is roughly keeping pace with price appreciation, suggesting valuations are not stretched.
Cycle Phase
Building activity may be outpacing demand absorption
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by migration and affordability, while price momentum provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory has surged +26% YoY with days on market up +14% — significant supply buildup indicating market stress.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Oversupply with deteriorating transactions and no credit excuse. Supply-driven correction risk is elevated.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
NormalRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Normal permit activity but demand has deteriorated significantly. The stress is from existing inventory and slowing absorption, not new construction.
Employment Concentration
Employment
Limited dataInternal Structure
Tuscaloosa's 3 counties show moderate divergence — Tuscaloosa County carries the most risk (Elevated) while Pickens County anchors the lower end.
Tuscaloosa, AL shows Moderate internal divergence — some counties diverge meaningfully from the metro picture. Tuscaloosa County contributes the most structural risk (Elevated, driven by permit growth), while Pickens County anchors the lower end (Below Average).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Tuscaloosa CountyRisk Driver | 75 |
Greene CountyUnscored | 50 |
Hale County | 38 |
Pickens CountyStabilizer | 38 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2026-06 | 36 |
| 2025-12 | 51 |
| 2025-11 | 42 |
| 2025-09 | 40 |
| 2025-08 | 47 |
| 2025-07 | 47 |
| 2025-05 | 53 |
| 2025-04 | 60 |
| 2025-02 | 54 |
| 2024-12 | 59 |
| 2024-10 | 60 |
| 2024-09 | 49 |
| 2024-08 | 42 |
| 2024-06 | 48 |
| 2024-04 | 41 |
| 2024-02 | 42 |
| 2023-12 | 44 |
| 2023-10 | 44 |
| 2023-09 | 40 |
| 2023-08 | 40 |
| 2023-06 | 40 |
| 2023-04 | 38 |
| 2023-02 | 39 |
| 2022-12 | 36 |
| 2022-11 | 38 |
| 2022-10 | 35 |
| 2022-08 | 38 |
| 2022-07 | 39 |
| 2022-05 | 42 |
| 2022-03 | 47 |
| 2022-02 | 47 |
| 2021-12 | 47 |
| 2021-09 | 49 |
| 2021-07 | 49 |
| 2021-06 | 48 |
| 2021-04 | 38 |
| 2021-03 | 50 |
| 2021-01 | 51 |
| 2020-10 | 58 |
| 2020-08 | 62 |
| 2020-06 | 63 |
| 2020-04 | 62 |
| 2020-03 | 44 |
| 2020-01 | 42 |
| 2019-10 | 36 |
| 2019-08 | 36 |
| 2019-06 | 38 |
| 2019-04 | 36 |
| 2019-03 | 38 |
| 2019-01 | 38 |