Executive Summary
Tulsa's housing market shows average risk, ranking 167th of 287 metros. The market recently entered Expansion. Inventory is growing moderately (+11% YoY) with stable liquidity. Broad-based growth with healthy fundamentals.
Tulsa experienced a market correction from mid-2024 through late 2024. The market has since normalized and entered Expansion.
Inventory is growing at a moderate +11% pace with homes taking -3% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Rent growth is roughly keeping pace with price appreciation, suggesting valuations are not stretched.
Cycle Phase
Normal growth conditions with balanced fundamentals
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by permit growth and permits per capita, while employment provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory is growing at a moderate +11% pace with homes taking -3% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Normal expansion. Credit is available, transactions are healthy — no constraints on current growth momentum.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
ElevatedRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Above-normal building activity with healthy demand. Balanced expansion — the market is absorbing new supply without stress.
Employment Concentration
Employment
ConcentratedInternal Structure
Tulsa's 6 counties show moderate divergence — Wagoner County carries the most risk (Elevated) while Creek County anchors the lower end.
Tulsa, OK shows Moderate internal divergence — some counties diverge meaningfully from the metro picture. Wagoner County contributes the most structural risk (Elevated, driven by permits per capita), while Creek County anchors the lower end (Below Average).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Rogers County | 75 |
Wagoner CountyRisk Driver | 75 |
Tulsa County | 65 |
Pawnee CountyUnscored | 50 |
Okmulgee County<5% | 40 |
Creek CountyStabilizer | 35 |
Osage County<5% | 10 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2025-11 | 33 |
| 2025-09 | 38 |
| 2025-07 | 42 |
| 2025-06 | 41 |
| 2025-04 | 41 |
| 2025-01 | 48 |
| 2024-12 | 43 |
| 2024-10 | 42 |
| 2024-09 | 37 |
| 2024-07 | 39 |
| 2024-05 | 40 |
| 2024-03 | 38 |
| 2023-12 | 40 |
| 2023-11 | 40 |
| 2023-10 | 39 |
| 2023-08 | 40 |
| 2023-07 | 42 |
| 2023-05 | 43 |
| 2023-03 | 43 |
| 2023-01 | 42 |
| 2022-10 | 46 |
| 2022-08 | 46 |
| 2022-06 | 50 |
| 2022-04 | 51 |
| 2022-01 | 51 |
| 2021-11 | 48 |
| 2021-10 | 48 |
| 2021-08 | 48 |
| 2021-05 | 46 |
| 2021-04 | 46 |
| 2021-02 | 44 |
| 2020-12 | 41 |
| 2020-10 | 43 |
| 2020-09 | 42 |
| 2020-07 | 41 |
| 2020-04 | 40 |
| 2020-02 | 47 |
| 2019-11 | 43 |
| 2019-09 | 37 |
| 2019-07 | 40 |
| 2019-04 | 35 |
| 2019-03 | 42 |
| 2019-01 | 44 |