Syracuse, NY
Cycle Phase
Syracuse experienced a market correction from late 2025 through late 2025. The market is currently recovering.
Market conditions are rebuilding after a correction period
Valuation Lag — Liquidity is improving but rent-price ratios remain compressed.
Syracuse's housing market shows elevated risk, ranking 10th of 287 metros. The market has been in Recovery for 5 months. Current conditions are balanced with stable liquidity.
Executive Summary
Risk is Elevated, driven primarily by permit growth and price momentum. The market is in Recovery phase. Liquidity is stable and valuation is compressed.
Top Risk Drivers (This Month)
Market Signals
Inventory is declining (-9% YoY), indicating a tight market with limited supply.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
Factor Breakdown
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
Underlying Values
| Metric | Value | Pctile |
|---|---|---|
| Price Momentum | +7.5% | p98 |
| Permit Growth | +136.5% | p99 |
| Permits/1K Pop | 3.30 | p42 |
| Affordability | 0.26 | p33 |
| Employment | +0.4% | p45 |
| Net AGI Migration | -$137K | p88 |
National ContextDoes not affect score
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Healthy recovery. Credit is flowing normally and transactions are steady — conditions favor continued rebuilding.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local SignalsDoes not affect score
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
SurgeRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Permit activity is surging and demand is absorbing it. Both sides of the market are running hot — monitor for overheating if liquidity shifts.
Liquidity
Liquidity
Internal Structure
Syracuse's counties diverge significantly — Onondaga County (High Risk) contrasts sharply with Madison County, making the metro average potentially misleading.
Syracuse, NY shows High internal divergence — the metro composite may obscure significant county-level differences. Onondaga County contributes the most structural risk (High Risk, driven by price momentum), while Madison County anchors the lower end (Low Risk).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Onondaga CountyRisk Driver | 100 |
Oswego County | 33 |
Madison CountyStabilizer | 17 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2025-11 | 57 |
| 2025-09 | 54 |
| 2025-07 | 54 |
| 2025-06 | 54 |
| 2025-05 | 54 |
| 2025-03 | 50 |
| 2025-01 | 53 |
| 2024-11 | 54 |
| 2024-10 | 57 |
| 2024-08 | 58 |
| 2024-06 | 56 |
| 2024-05 | 58 |
| 2024-03 | 55 |
| 2024-02 | 57 |
| 2023-12 | 63 |
| 2023-09 | 64 |
| 2023-07 | 61 |
| 2023-05 | 62 |
| 2023-04 | 61 |
| 2023-02 | 61 |
| 2022-11 | 50 |
| 2022-10 | 52 |
| 2022-08 | 50 |
| 2022-07 | 51 |
| 2022-05 | 51 |
| 2022-02 | 49 |
| 2022-01 | 47 |
| 2021-11 | 50 |
| 2021-09 | 52 |
| 2021-07 | 50 |
| 2021-04 | 45 |
| 2021-03 | 60 |
| 2021-01 | 59 |
| 2020-12 | 60 |
| 2020-10 | 59 |
| 2020-08 | 60 |
| 2020-06 | 52 |
| 2020-03 | 54 |
| 2020-02 | 58 |
| 2019-12 | 62 |
| 2019-09 | 56 |
| 2019-06 | 52 |
| 2019-03 | 45 |
| 2019-01 | 46 |