Syracuse, NY
Executive Summary
Syracuse's housing market shows elevated risk, ranking 9th of 287 metros. The market has been in Recovery for 5 months. Current conditions are balanced with stable liquidity. Early signs of stabilization — conditions may favor patient buyers. Valuations are also showing some stretch.
Syracuse experienced a market correction from late 2025 through late 2025. The market is currently recovering.
Inventory is declining (-9% YoY), indicating a tight market with limited supply.
Home prices are outpacing rents (-4.0% rent-price ratio change), indicating some valuation compression.
Cycle Phase
Market conditions are rebuilding after a correction period
Valuation Lag — Liquidity is improving but rent-price ratios remain compressed.
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by price momentum and permit growth, while affordability provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory is declining (-9% YoY), indicating a tight market with limited supply.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Healthy recovery. Credit is flowing normally and transactions are steady — conditions favor continued rebuilding.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
SurgeRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Permit activity is surging and demand is absorbing it. Both sides of the market are running hot — monitor for overheating if liquidity shifts.
Employment Concentration
Employment
ModerateInternal Structure
Syracuse's 3 counties show moderate divergence — Onondaga County carries the most risk (Elevated) while Oswego County anchors the lower end.
Syracuse, NY shows Moderate internal divergence — some counties diverge meaningfully from the metro picture. Onondaga County contributes the most structural risk (Elevated, driven by price momentum), while Oswego County anchors the lower end (Below Average).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Onondaga CountyRisk Driver | 75 |
Madison County | 38 |
Oswego CountyStabilizer | 38 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2025-11 | 57 |
| 2025-09 | 54 |
| 2025-07 | 54 |
| 2025-06 | 54 |
| 2025-05 | 54 |
| 2025-03 | 50 |
| 2025-01 | 53 |
| 2024-11 | 54 |
| 2024-10 | 57 |
| 2024-08 | 58 |
| 2024-06 | 56 |
| 2024-05 | 58 |
| 2024-03 | 55 |
| 2024-02 | 57 |
| 2023-12 | 63 |
| 2023-09 | 64 |
| 2023-07 | 61 |
| 2023-05 | 62 |
| 2023-04 | 61 |
| 2023-02 | 61 |
| 2022-11 | 50 |
| 2022-10 | 52 |
| 2022-08 | 50 |
| 2022-07 | 51 |
| 2022-05 | 51 |
| 2022-02 | 49 |
| 2022-01 | 47 |
| 2021-11 | 50 |
| 2021-09 | 52 |
| 2021-07 | 50 |
| 2021-04 | 45 |
| 2021-03 | 60 |
| 2021-01 | 59 |
| 2020-12 | 60 |
| 2020-10 | 59 |
| 2020-08 | 60 |
| 2020-06 | 52 |
| 2020-03 | 54 |
| 2020-02 | 58 |
| 2019-12 | 62 |
| 2019-09 | 56 |
| 2019-06 | 52 |
| 2019-03 | 45 |
| 2019-01 | 46 |