Syracuse, NY
Executive Summary
Syracuse's housing market shows elevated risk, ranking 7th of 274 metros. The market recently entered Recovery. Inventory levels are elevated, warranting monitoring. Recovery underway but inventory still elevated — watch for follow-through.
Syracuse experienced a market correction from late 2025 through late 2025. The market is currently recovering.
Inventory is elevated (+24% YoY) and days on market are up -21% — supply is building but not yet at stress levels.
Rent growth is roughly keeping pace with price appreciation, suggesting valuations are not stretched.
Cycle Phase
Market conditions are rebuilding after a correction period
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by permit growth and migration, while affordability provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory is elevated (+24% YoY) and days on market are up -21% — supply is building but not yet at stress levels.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Early-stage recovery with lingering transaction weakness. Credit is available but buyer activity hasn't fully returned yet.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
SurgeRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Heavy building into softening demand. The construction pipeline may outrun absorption — watch for inventory acceleration in coming months.
Employment Concentration
Employment
ModerateInternal Structure
Syracuse's counties diverge significantly — Onondaga County (High Risk) contrasts sharply with Oswego County, making the metro average potentially misleading.
Syracuse, NY shows High internal divergence — the metro composite may obscure significant county-level differences. Onondaga County contributes the most structural risk (High Risk, driven by permit growth), while Oswego County anchors the lower end (Low Risk).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Onondaga CountyRisk Driver | 88 |
Madison County | 62 |
Oswego CountyStabilizer | 0 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2026-05 | 67 |
| 2025-12 | 68 |
| 2025-10 | 54 |
| 2025-07 | 54 |
| 2025-06 | 54 |
| 2025-05 | 54 |
| 2025-03 | 50 |
| 2025-01 | 53 |
| 2024-11 | 54 |
| 2024-10 | 57 |
| 2024-08 | 58 |
| 2024-06 | 56 |
| 2024-05 | 58 |
| 2024-03 | 55 |
| 2024-02 | 57 |
| 2023-12 | 63 |
| 2023-09 | 64 |
| 2023-07 | 61 |
| 2023-05 | 62 |
| 2023-04 | 61 |
| 2023-02 | 61 |
| 2022-11 | 50 |
| 2022-10 | 52 |
| 2022-08 | 50 |
| 2022-07 | 51 |
| 2022-05 | 51 |
| 2022-02 | 49 |
| 2022-01 | 47 |
| 2021-11 | 50 |
| 2021-09 | 52 |
| 2021-07 | 50 |
| 2021-04 | 45 |
| 2021-03 | 60 |
| 2021-01 | 59 |
| 2020-12 | 60 |
| 2020-10 | 59 |
| 2020-08 | 60 |
| 2020-06 | 52 |
| 2020-03 | 54 |
| 2020-02 | 58 |
| 2019-12 | 62 |
| 2019-09 | 56 |
| 2019-06 | 52 |
| 2019-03 | 45 |
| 2019-01 | 46 |