Springfield, MO
Executive Summary
Springfield's housing market shows below-average risk, ranking 255th of 287 metros. The market recently entered Expansion. Current conditions are balanced with stable liquidity. Broad-based growth with healthy fundamentals.
Springfield experienced a market correction from early 2025 through mid-2025. The market has since normalized and entered Expansion.
Inventory is growing at a moderate +8% pace with homes taking -3% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Rent growth is roughly keeping pace with price appreciation, suggesting valuations are not stretched.
Cycle Phase
Normal growth conditions with balanced fundamentals
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by migration and affordability, while employment provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory is growing at a moderate +8% pace with homes taking -3% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Normal expansion. Credit is available, transactions are healthy — no constraints on current growth momentum.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
CoolingRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Builders are pulling back but demand remains healthy. A supply constraint could form — fewer new units entering a market that is still absorbing well.
Employment Concentration
Employment
Limited dataInternal Structure
Springfield's 5 counties show similar risk profiles — the metro-level score is broadly representative.
Springfield, MO shows Low internal divergence — county-level differences are minor and the metro composite is broadly representative. Polk County contributes the most structural risk (Elevated, driven by permit growth), while Webster County anchors the lower end (Below Average).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Polk CountyRisk Driver | 69 |
Greene County | 62 |
Christian County | 56 |
Webster CountyStabilizer | 38 |
Dallas County<5% | 25 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2025-11 | 38 |
| 2025-09 | 40 |
| 2025-08 | 40 |
| 2025-06 | 43 |
| 2025-04 | 42 |
| 2025-02 | 54 |
| 2025-01 | 51 |
| 2024-11 | 44 |
| 2024-08 | 42 |
| 2024-06 | 50 |
| 2024-04 | 53 |
| 2024-02 | 53 |
| 2024-01 | 54 |
| 2023-11 | 53 |
| 2023-09 | 54 |
| 2023-08 | 53 |
| 2023-06 | 50 |
| 2023-05 | 52 |
| 2023-03 | 52 |
| 2023-02 | 53 |
| 2022-12 | 57 |
| 2022-09 | 58 |
| 2022-07 | 60 |
| 2022-05 | 58 |
| 2022-04 | 57 |
| 2022-02 | 58 |
| 2021-12 | 57 |
| 2021-10 | 53 |
| 2021-09 | 54 |
| 2021-07 | 54 |
| 2021-04 | 51 |
| 2021-02 | 40 |
| 2020-12 | 48 |
| 2020-10 | 50 |
| 2020-09 | 50 |
| 2020-07 | 52 |
| 2020-05 | 52 |
| 2020-03 | 60 |
| 2019-12 | 56 |
| 2019-09 | 54 |
| 2019-06 | 55 |
| 2019-04 | 53 |
| 2019-03 | 50 |
| 2019-01 | 50 |