Springfield, MO
Cycle Phase
Springfield experienced a market correction from early 2025 through mid-2025. The market has since normalized and entered Expansion.
Normal growth conditions with balanced fundamentals
Springfield's housing market shows below-average risk, ranking 281st of 287 metros. The market recently entered Expansion. Current conditions are balanced with stable liquidity.
Executive Summary
Risk is Below Average, driven primarily by migration and permits per capita. The market is in Expansion phase. Liquidity is stable and valuation is balanced.
Top Risk Drivers (This Month)
Market Signals
Inventory is growing at a moderate +8% pace with homes taking -3% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
Factor Breakdown
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
Underlying Values
| Metric | Value | Pctile |
|---|---|---|
| Price Momentum | -0.2% | p12 |
| Permit Growth | -24.1% | p14 |
| Permits/1K Pop | 3.41 | p44 |
| Affordability | 0.27 | p44 |
| Employment | +1.4% | p9 |
| Net AGI Migration | +$14K | p50 |
National ContextDoes not affect score
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Normal expansion. Credit is available, transactions are healthy — no constraints on current growth momentum.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local SignalsDoes not affect score
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
CoolingRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Builders are pulling back but demand remains healthy. A supply constraint could form — fewer new units entering a market that is still absorbing well.
Liquidity
Liquidity
Internal Structure
Springfield's 5 counties show moderate divergence — Polk County carries the most risk (Elevated) while Dallas County anchors the lower end.
Springfield, MO shows Moderate internal divergence — some counties diverge meaningfully from the metro picture. Polk County contributes the most structural risk (Elevated, driven by permit growth), while Dallas County anchors the lower end (Below Average).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Greene County | 67 |
Polk CountyRisk Driver | 67 |
Christian County | 42 |
Webster County | 42 |
Dallas CountyStabilizer | 33 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2025-11 | 38 |
| 2025-09 | 40 |
| 2025-08 | 40 |
| 2025-06 | 43 |
| 2025-04 | 42 |
| 2025-02 | 54 |
| 2025-01 | 51 |
| 2024-11 | 44 |
| 2024-08 | 42 |
| 2024-06 | 50 |
| 2024-04 | 53 |
| 2024-02 | 53 |
| 2024-01 | 54 |
| 2023-11 | 53 |
| 2023-09 | 54 |
| 2023-08 | 53 |
| 2023-06 | 50 |
| 2023-05 | 52 |
| 2023-03 | 52 |
| 2023-02 | 53 |
| 2022-12 | 57 |
| 2022-09 | 58 |
| 2022-07 | 60 |
| 2022-05 | 58 |
| 2022-04 | 57 |
| 2022-02 | 58 |
| 2021-12 | 57 |
| 2021-10 | 53 |
| 2021-09 | 54 |
| 2021-07 | 54 |
| 2021-04 | 51 |
| 2021-02 | 40 |
| 2020-12 | 48 |
| 2020-10 | 50 |
| 2020-09 | 50 |
| 2020-07 | 52 |
| 2020-05 | 52 |
| 2020-03 | 60 |
| 2019-12 | 56 |
| 2019-09 | 54 |
| 2019-06 | 55 |
| 2019-04 | 53 |
| 2019-03 | 50 |
| 2019-01 | 50 |