Shreveport-Bossier City, LA
Executive Summary
Shreveport's housing market shows average risk, ranking 106th of 274 metros. The market recently entered Recovery. Current conditions are balanced with stable liquidity. Early signs of stabilization — conditions may favor patient buyers.
Shreveport experienced a market correction from early 2025 through mid-2025. The market is currently recovering.
Inventory is declining (-9% YoY), indicating a tight market with limited supply.
Rent growth is roughly keeping pace with price appreciation, suggesting valuations are not stretched.
Cycle Phase
Market conditions are rebuilding after a correction period
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by migration and employment, while price momentum provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory is declining (-9% YoY), indicating a tight market with limited supply.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Healthy recovery. Credit is flowing normally and transactions are steady — conditions favor continued rebuilding.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
SurgeRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Permit activity is surging and demand is absorbing it. Both sides of the market are running hot — monitor for overheating if liquidity shifts.
Employment Concentration
Employment
ModerateInternal Structure
Shreveport's 3 counties show moderate divergence — Bossier Parish carries the most risk (Elevated) while De Soto Parish anchors the lower end.
Shreveport, LA shows Moderate internal divergence — some counties diverge meaningfully from the metro picture. Bossier Parish contributes the most structural risk (Elevated, driven by price momentum), while De Soto Parish anchors the lower end (Low Risk).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Bossier ParishRisk Driver | 75 |
Caddo Parish | 50 |
De Soto ParishStabilizer | 25 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2025-12 | 51 |
| 2025-10 | 53 |
| 2025-08 | 48 |
| 2025-07 | 48 |
| 2025-05 | 48 |
| 2025-04 | 46 |
| 2025-02 | 43 |
| 2025-01 | 44 |
| 2024-11 | 44 |
| 2024-09 | 49 |
| 2024-07 | 50 |
| 2024-06 | 54 |
| 2024-04 | 56 |
| 2024-01 | 57 |
| 2023-11 | 58 |
| 2023-09 | 56 |
| 2023-08 | 55 |
| 2023-06 | 50 |
| 2023-04 | 46 |
| 2023-02 | 53 |
| 2022-11 | 50 |
| 2022-10 | 51 |
| 2022-09 | 52 |
| 2022-07 | 50 |
| 2022-05 | 50 |
| 2022-04 | 50 |
| 2022-03 | 52 |
| 2022-01 | 51 |
| 2021-12 | 53 |
| 2021-10 | 52 |
| 2021-07 | 50 |
| 2021-05 | 51 |
| 2021-03 | 54 |
| 2021-01 | 53 |
| 2020-11 | 53 |
| 2020-09 | 62 |
| 2020-07 | 58 |
| 2020-04 | 57 |
| 2020-01 | 60 |
| 2019-11 | 56 |
| 2019-09 | 60 |
| 2019-08 | 60 |
| 2019-06 | 58 |
| 2019-03 | 57 |
| 2019-01 | 57 |