San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX
Executive Summary
San Antonio's housing market shows below-average risk, ranking 268th of 274 metros. The market recently entered Recovery. Current conditions are balanced with stable liquidity. Early signs of stabilization — conditions may favor patient buyers.
San Antonio experienced a market correction from mid-2025 through mid-2025. The market is currently recovering.
Inventory is growing at a moderate +5% pace with homes taking -2% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Rent growth is roughly keeping pace with price appreciation, suggesting valuations are not stretched.
Cycle Phase
Market conditions are rebuilding after a correction period
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by affordability and permits per capita, while migration provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory is growing at a moderate +5% pace with homes taking -2% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Healthy recovery. Credit is flowing normally and transactions are steady — conditions favor continued rebuilding.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
Sharp CoolingRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Significant supply pullback into healthy demand. A supply constraint is forming — pricing power is shifting to existing inventory holders.
Employment Concentration
Employment
ConcentratedInternal Structure
San Antonio's 7 counties show similar risk profiles — the metro-level score is broadly representative.
San Antonio, TX shows Low internal divergence — county-level differences are minor and the metro composite is broadly representative. Comal County contributes the most structural risk (Elevated, driven by permits per capita), while Guadalupe County anchors the lower end (Average).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Comal CountyRisk Driver | 71 |
Wilson County<5% | 58 |
Bexar County | 58 |
Guadalupe CountyStabilizer | 50 |
Bandera CountyUnscored | 50 |
Atascosa County<5% | 46 |
Kendall County<5% | 42 |
Medina County<5% | 25 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2026-05 | 26 |
| 2025-11 | 34 |
| 2025-09 | 32 |
| 2025-07 | 37 |
| 2025-06 | 36 |
| 2025-04 | 31 |
| 2025-02 | 32 |
| 2024-11 | 34 |
| 2024-08 | 30 |
| 2024-06 | 36 |
| 2024-04 | 37 |
| 2024-02 | 34 |
| 2023-12 | 34 |
| 2023-11 | 33 |
| 2023-10 | 33 |
| 2023-09 | 34 |
| 2023-08 | 35 |
| 2023-06 | 36 |
| 2023-03 | 38 |
| 2023-01 | 40 |
| 2022-10 | 43 |
| 2022-09 | 43 |
| 2022-08 | 43 |
| 2022-06 | 45 |
| 2022-04 | 44 |
| 2022-02 | 43 |
| 2021-11 | 42 |
| 2021-08 | 42 |
| 2021-05 | 46 |
| 2021-03 | 43 |
| 2020-12 | 40 |
| 2020-09 | 43 |
| 2020-06 | 38 |
| 2020-03 | 45 |
| 2020-01 | 45 |
| 2019-11 | 43 |
| 2019-10 | 42 |
| 2019-08 | 48 |
| 2019-07 | 48 |
| 2019-05 | 48 |
| 2019-04 | 48 |
| 2019-03 | 47 |
| 2019-01 | 48 |