San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX
Executive Summary
San Antonio's housing market shows below-average risk, ranking 261st of 273 metros. The market recently entered Expansion. Current conditions are balanced with stable liquidity. Broad-based growth with healthy fundamentals.
San Antonio experienced a market correction from mid-2025 through mid-2025. The market has since normalized and entered Expansion.
Inventory is roughly flat (+4% YoY) with homes selling at a normal pace — a balanced market.
Rent growth is roughly keeping pace with price appreciation, suggesting valuations are not stretched.
Cycle Phase
Normal growth conditions with balanced fundamentals
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by affordability and permits per capita, while migration provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory is roughly flat (+4% YoY) with homes selling at a normal pace — a balanced market.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Normal expansion. Credit is available, transactions are healthy — no constraints on current growth momentum.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
Sharp CoolingRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Significant supply pullback into healthy demand. A supply constraint is forming — pricing power is shifting to existing inventory holders.
Employment Concentration
Employment
ConcentratedInternal Structure
San Antonio's 7 counties show similar risk profiles — the metro-level score is broadly representative.
San Antonio, TX shows Low internal divergence — county-level differences are minor and the metro composite is broadly representative. Comal County contributes the most structural risk (Elevated, driven by permits per capita), while Guadalupe County anchors the lower end (Average).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Comal CountyRisk Driver | 71 |
Wilson County<5% | 58 |
Bexar County | 58 |
Guadalupe CountyStabilizer | 50 |
Bandera CountyUnscored | 50 |
Atascosa County<5% | 46 |
Kendall County<5% | 42 |
Medina County<5% | 25 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2026-06 | 28 |
| 2025-12 | 31 |
| 2025-11 | 34 |
| 2025-09 | 32 |
| 2025-07 | 37 |
| 2025-06 | 36 |
| 2025-04 | 31 |
| 2025-02 | 32 |
| 2024-11 | 34 |
| 2024-08 | 30 |
| 2024-06 | 36 |
| 2024-04 | 37 |
| 2024-02 | 34 |
| 2023-12 | 34 |
| 2023-11 | 33 |
| 2023-10 | 33 |
| 2023-09 | 34 |
| 2023-08 | 35 |
| 2023-06 | 36 |
| 2023-03 | 38 |
| 2023-01 | 40 |
| 2022-10 | 43 |
| 2022-09 | 43 |
| 2022-08 | 43 |
| 2022-06 | 45 |
| 2022-04 | 44 |
| 2022-02 | 43 |
| 2021-11 | 42 |
| 2021-08 | 42 |
| 2021-05 | 46 |
| 2021-03 | 43 |
| 2020-12 | 40 |
| 2020-09 | 43 |
| 2020-06 | 38 |
| 2020-03 | 45 |
| 2020-01 | 45 |
| 2019-11 | 43 |
| 2019-10 | 42 |
| 2019-08 | 48 |
| 2019-07 | 48 |
| 2019-05 | 48 |
| 2019-04 | 48 |
| 2019-03 | 47 |
| 2019-01 | 48 |