Rochester, MN
Executive Summary
Rochester's housing market shows elevated risk, ranking 27th of 273 metros. The market recently entered Recession. The market shows signs of liquidity stress with elevated inventory. Deep correction with severe liquidity stress — significant risk remains.
Rochester experienced a market correction from early 2025 through mid-2025.
Inventory has surged +53% YoY with days on market up -2% — significant supply buildup indicating market stress.
Rent growth is roughly keeping pace with price appreciation, suggesting valuations are not stretched.
Cycle Phase
Demand contraction with rising inventory pressure
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by permit growth and migration, while affordability provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory has surged +53% YoY with days on market up -2% — significant supply buildup indicating market stress.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Active correction with weak transactions but available credit. Buyers can borrow — they're choosing not to at current prices.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
SurgeRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Significant overbuilding into weak demand. This is the highest-risk metro combination — new supply is delivering into a market that is already struggling to absorb existing inventory.
Employment Concentration
Employment
ConcentratedInternal Structure
Rochester's 4 counties show similar risk profiles — the metro-level score is broadly representative.
Rochester, MN shows Low internal divergence — county-level differences are minor and the metro composite is broadly representative. Dodge County contributes the most structural risk (Elevated, driven by permits per capita), while Fillmore County anchors the lower end (Below Average).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Dodge CountyRisk Driver | 58 |
Wabasha County | 58 |
Olmsted County | 50 |
Fillmore CountyStabilizer | 33 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2026-06 | 56 |
| 2025-12 | 31 |
| 2025-10 | 54 |
| 2025-08 | 52 |
| 2025-05 | 44 |
| 2025-04 | 43 |
| 2025-02 | 48 |
| 2025-01 | 49 |
| 2024-12 | 45 |
| 2024-10 | 48 |
| 2024-09 | 54 |
| 2024-07 | 53 |
| 2024-06 | 55 |
| 2024-04 | 55 |
| 2024-03 | 54 |
| 2024-01 | 62 |
| 2023-12 | 58 |
| 2023-11 | 59 |
| 2023-09 | 59 |
| 2023-08 | 60 |
| 2023-06 | 57 |
| 2023-05 | 58 |
| 2023-03 | 52 |
| 2023-01 | 58 |
| 2022-11 | 57 |
| 2022-10 | 58 |
| 2022-08 | 60 |
| 2022-06 | 62 |
| 2022-04 | 62 |
| 2022-03 | 60 |
| 2022-01 | 58 |
| 2021-12 | 58 |
| 2021-10 | 62 |
| 2021-07 | 58 |
| 2021-05 | 60 |
| 2021-04 | 62 |
| 2021-02 | 54 |
| 2021-01 | 55 |
| 2020-11 | 54 |
| 2020-08 | 58 |
| 2020-05 | 50 |
| 2020-02 | 48 |
| 2020-01 | 50 |
| 2019-11 | 49 |
| 2019-10 | 51 |
| 2019-08 | 52 |
| 2019-05 | 56 |
| 2019-04 | 56 |
| 2019-03 | 60 |
| 2019-01 | 55 |