Rochester, MN
Executive Summary
Rochester's housing market shows below-average risk, ranking 263rd of 287 metros. The market recently entered Expansion. Inventory is growing moderately (+14% YoY) with stable liquidity. Broad-based growth with healthy fundamentals.
Rochester experienced a market correction from early 2025 through mid-2025. The market has since normalized and entered Expansion.
Inventory is growing at a moderate +14% pace with homes taking -6% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Rent growth is roughly keeping pace with price appreciation, suggesting valuations are not stretched.
Cycle Phase
Normal growth conditions with balanced fundamentals
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by migration and price momentum, while employment provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory is growing at a moderate +14% pace with homes taking -6% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Normal expansion. Credit is available, transactions are healthy — no constraints on current growth momentum.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
Sharp CoolingRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Significant supply pullback into healthy demand. A supply constraint is forming — pricing power is shifting to existing inventory holders.
Employment Concentration
Employment
ConcentratedInternal Structure
Rochester's 4 counties show moderate divergence — Dodge County carries the most risk (Elevated) while Fillmore County anchors the lower end.
Rochester, MN shows Moderate internal divergence — some counties diverge meaningfully from the metro picture. Dodge County contributes the most structural risk (Elevated, driven by permit growth), while Fillmore County anchors the lower end (Low Risk).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Dodge CountyRisk Driver | 67 |
Olmsted County | 67 |
Wabasha County | 50 |
Fillmore CountyStabilizer | 16 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2025-11 | 54 |
| 2025-10 | 54 |
| 2025-08 | 52 |
| 2025-05 | 44 |
| 2025-04 | 43 |
| 2025-02 | 48 |
| 2025-01 | 49 |
| 2024-12 | 45 |
| 2024-10 | 48 |
| 2024-09 | 54 |
| 2024-07 | 53 |
| 2024-06 | 55 |
| 2024-04 | 55 |
| 2024-03 | 54 |
| 2024-01 | 62 |
| 2023-12 | 58 |
| 2023-11 | 59 |
| 2023-09 | 59 |
| 2023-08 | 60 |
| 2023-06 | 57 |
| 2023-05 | 58 |
| 2023-03 | 52 |
| 2023-01 | 58 |
| 2022-11 | 57 |
| 2022-10 | 58 |
| 2022-08 | 60 |
| 2022-06 | 62 |
| 2022-04 | 62 |
| 2022-03 | 60 |
| 2022-01 | 58 |
| 2021-12 | 58 |
| 2021-10 | 62 |
| 2021-07 | 58 |
| 2021-05 | 60 |
| 2021-04 | 62 |
| 2021-02 | 54 |
| 2021-01 | 55 |
| 2020-11 | 54 |
| 2020-08 | 58 |
| 2020-05 | 50 |
| 2020-02 | 48 |
| 2020-01 | 50 |
| 2019-11 | 49 |
| 2019-10 | 51 |
| 2019-08 | 52 |
| 2019-05 | 56 |
| 2019-04 | 56 |
| 2019-03 | 60 |
| 2019-01 | 55 |