Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA
Executive Summary
Portland's housing market shows average risk, ranking 69th of 287 metros. The market recently entered Recovery. Inventory is growing moderately (+11% YoY) with stable liquidity. Early signs of stabilization — conditions may favor patient buyers.
Portland experienced a market correction from early 2025 through mid-2025. The market is currently recovering.
Inventory is growing at a moderate +11% pace with homes taking +8% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Cycle Phase
Market conditions are rebuilding after a correction period
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by migration and employment, while price momentum provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory is growing at a moderate +11% pace with homes taking +8% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Liquidity
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Healthy recovery. Credit is flowing normally and transactions are steady — conditions favor continued rebuilding.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
CoolingRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Builders are pulling back but demand remains healthy. A supply constraint could form — fewer new units entering a market that is still absorbing well.
Employment Concentration
Employment
ModerateInternal Structure
Portland's counties diverge significantly — Clark County (High Risk) contrasts sharply with Multnomah County, making the metro average potentially misleading.
Portland, OR-WA shows High internal divergence — the metro composite may obscure significant county-level differences. Clark County contributes the most structural risk (High Risk, driven by permit growth), while Multnomah County anchors the lower end (Below Average).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Clark CountyRisk Driver | 84 |
Clackamas County | 62 |
Yamhill County<5% | 62 |
Washington County | 54 |
Columbia County<5% | 38 |
Multnomah CountyStabilizer | 34 |
Skamania County<5% | 17 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2025-11 | 54 |
| 2025-09 | 54 |
| 2025-07 | 53 |
| 2025-05 | 51 |
| 2025-03 | 50 |
| 2024-12 | 51 |
| 2024-11 | 50 |
| 2024-09 | 51 |
| 2024-06 | 51 |
| 2024-04 | 51 |
| 2024-03 | 51 |
| 2024-01 | 53 |
| 2023-11 | 46 |
| 2023-08 | 51 |
| 2023-06 | 46 |
| 2023-05 | 46 |
| 2023-03 | 44 |
| 2023-01 | 42 |
| 2022-11 | 46 |
| 2022-10 | 44 |
| 2022-08 | 42 |
| 2022-06 | 51 |
| 2022-05 | 50 |
| 2022-04 | 51 |
| 2022-02 | 50 |
| 2022-01 | 50 |
| 2021-11 | 52 |
| 2021-10 | 53 |
| 2021-08 | 58 |
| 2021-05 | 60 |
| 2021-02 | 64 |
| 2021-01 | 63 |
| 2020-11 | 49 |
| 2020-08 | 45 |
| 2020-06 | 44 |
| 2020-04 | 40 |
| 2020-03 | 37 |
| 2020-01 | 37 |
| 2019-10 | 34 |
| 2019-07 | 31 |
| 2019-06 | 32 |
| 2019-05 | 32 |
| 2019-04 | 32 |
| 2019-03 | 33 |
| 2019-01 | 34 |