Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL
Executive Summary
Orlando's housing market shows average risk, ranking 83rd of 287 metros. The market has been in Recovery for 4 months. Current conditions are balanced with stable liquidity. Early signs of stabilization — conditions may favor patient buyers.
Orlando experienced a market correction from early 2025 through mid-2025. The market is currently recovering.
Inventory is growing at a moderate +7% pace with homes taking +4% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Rent growth is roughly keeping pace with price appreciation, suggesting valuations are not stretched.
Cycle Phase
Market conditions are rebuilding after a correction period
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by permits per capita and affordability, while migration provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory is growing at a moderate +7% pace with homes taking +4% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Healthy recovery. Credit is flowing normally and transactions are steady — conditions favor continued rebuilding.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
NormalRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Supply and demand are in equilibrium. No unusual activity on either side of the market.
Employment Concentration
Employment
DiversifiedInternal Structure
Orlando's counties diverge significantly — Osceola County (High Risk) contrasts sharply with Lake County, making the metro average potentially misleading.
Orlando, FL shows High internal divergence — the metro composite may obscure significant county-level differences. Osceola County contributes the most structural risk (High Risk, driven by price momentum), while Lake County anchors the lower end (Low Risk).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Osceola CountyRisk Driver | 83 |
Orange County | 58 |
Seminole County | 34 |
Lake CountyStabilizer | 25 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2025-11 | 44 |
| 2025-09 | 43 |
| 2025-08 | 42 |
| 2025-06 | 44 |
| 2025-05 | 43 |
| 2025-03 | 43 |
| 2025-02 | 43 |
| 2024-12 | 50 |
| 2024-09 | 43 |
| 2024-06 | 46 |
| 2024-04 | 46 |
| 2024-01 | 45 |
| 2023-11 | 41 |
| 2023-09 | 43 |
| 2023-07 | 43 |
| 2023-06 | 42 |
| 2023-04 | 46 |
| 2023-02 | 50 |
| 2022-12 | 52 |
| 2022-09 | 51 |
| 2022-06 | 49 |
| 2022-05 | 49 |
| 2022-03 | 49 |
| 2022-01 | 48 |
| 2021-11 | 47 |
| 2021-10 | 47 |
| 2021-08 | 46 |
| 2021-05 | 46 |
| 2021-03 | 59 |
| 2021-01 | 58 |
| 2020-11 | 60 |
| 2020-10 | 62 |
| 2020-08 | 62 |
| 2020-05 | 63 |
| 2020-03 | 55 |
| 2020-02 | 53 |
| 2019-12 | 48 |
| 2019-09 | 53 |
| 2019-06 | 49 |
| 2019-05 | 49 |
| 2019-03 | 51 |
| 2019-02 | 51 |
| 2019-01 | 52 |