Montgomery, AL
Executive Summary
Montgomery's housing market shows average risk, ranking 91st of 274 metros. The market recently entered Recovery. Inventory is growing moderately (+12% YoY) with stable liquidity. Early signs of stabilization — conditions may favor patient buyers.
Montgomery experienced a market correction from early 2025 through mid-2025. The market is currently recovering.
Inventory is growing at a moderate +12% pace with homes taking +9% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Rent growth is roughly keeping pace with price appreciation, suggesting valuations are not stretched.
Cycle Phase
Market conditions are rebuilding after a correction period
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by price momentum and migration, while affordability provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory is growing at a moderate +12% pace with homes taking +9% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Healthy recovery. Credit is flowing normally and transactions are steady — conditions favor continued rebuilding.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
ElevatedRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Above-normal building activity with healthy demand. Balanced expansion — the market is absorbing new supply without stress.
Employment Concentration
Employment
Limited dataInternal Structure
Montgomery's 4 counties show similar risk profiles — the metro-level score is broadly representative.
Montgomery, AL shows Low internal divergence — county-level differences are minor and the metro composite is broadly representative. Elmore County contributes the most structural risk (Elevated, driven by price momentum), while Autauga County anchors the lower end (Average).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Elmore CountyRisk Driver | 58 |
Montgomery County | 58 |
Autauga CountyStabilizer | 46 |
Lowndes County<5% | 33 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2025-12 | 48 |
| 2025-10 | 33 |
| 2025-08 | 34 |
| 2025-06 | 35 |
| 2025-04 | 36 |
| 2025-01 | 46 |
| 2024-12 | 45 |
| 2024-11 | 43 |
| 2024-10 | 43 |
| 2024-08 | 32 |
| 2024-05 | 28 |
| 2024-03 | 30 |
| 2024-01 | 28 |
| 2023-11 | 30 |
| 2023-09 | 37 |
| 2023-08 | 38 |
| 2023-06 | 36 |
| 2023-04 | 39 |
| 2023-02 | 44 |
| 2022-12 | 48 |
| 2022-09 | 47 |
| 2022-08 | 47 |
| 2022-06 | 41 |
| 2022-03 | 46 |
| 2022-01 | 41 |
| 2021-11 | 38 |
| 2021-10 | 38 |
| 2021-08 | 35 |
| 2021-05 | 40 |
| 2021-03 | 32 |
| 2021-01 | 31 |
| 2020-10 | 33 |
| 2020-08 | 38 |
| 2020-07 | 38 |
| 2020-05 | 40 |
| 2020-02 | 42 |
| 2020-01 | 40 |
| 2019-11 | 38 |
| 2019-08 | 39 |
| 2019-06 | 39 |
| 2019-04 | 39 |
| 2019-03 | 41 |
| 2019-01 | 42 |