Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI
Executive Summary
Minneapolis's housing market shows average risk, ranking 199th of 273 metros. The market recently entered Recession. The market shows signs of liquidity stress with elevated inventory. Deep correction with severe liquidity stress — significant risk remains.
Minneapolis experienced a market correction from early 2023 through early 2023.
Inventory has surged +33% YoY with days on market up +0% — significant supply buildup indicating market stress.
Rent growth is roughly keeping pace with price appreciation, suggesting valuations are not stretched.
Cycle Phase
Demand contraction with rising inventory pressure
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by migration and price momentum, while affordability provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory has surged +33% YoY with days on market up +0% — significant supply buildup indicating market stress.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Active correction with weak transactions but available credit. Buyers can borrow — they're choosing not to at current prices.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
Sharp CoolingRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Both supply and demand are in contraction. The market is in full retreat — builders have stopped and buyers have pulled back.
Employment Concentration
Employment
ModerateInternal Structure
Minneapolis's 15 counties show moderate divergence — Washington County carries the most risk (Elevated) while Anoka County anchors the lower end.
Minneapolis, MN-WI shows Moderate internal divergence — some counties diverge meaningfully from the metro picture. Washington County contributes the most structural risk (Elevated, driven by permit growth), while Anoka County anchors the lower end (Below Average).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Carver County<5% | 78 |
Pierce County<5% | 77 |
Washington CountyRisk Driver | 70 |
Scott County<5% | 57 |
Hennepin County | 54 |
St. Croix County<5% | 54 |
Isanti County<5% | 52 |
Le Sueur County<5% | 50 |
Dakota County | 44 |
Ramsey County | 39 |
Anoka CountyStabilizer | 38 |
Wright County<5% | 36 |
Mille Lacs County<5% | 36 |
Chisago County<5% | 34 |
Sherburne County<5% | 32 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2026-06 | 41 |
| 2025-12 | 46 |
| 2025-09 | 41 |
| 2025-07 | 45 |
| 2025-06 | 44 |
| 2025-04 | 44 |
| 2025-01 | 43 |
| 2024-11 | 42 |
| 2024-10 | 41 |
| 2024-08 | 42 |
| 2024-07 | 42 |
| 2024-05 | 42 |
| 2024-03 | 40 |
| 2024-01 | 43 |
| 2023-11 | 41 |
| 2023-08 | 44 |
| 2023-06 | 44 |
| 2023-03 | 40 |
| 2023-01 | 42 |
| 2022-12 | 44 |
| 2022-10 | 42 |
| 2022-08 | 42 |
| 2022-07 | 41 |
| 2022-05 | 43 |
| 2022-03 | 43 |
| 2022-01 | 42 |
| 2021-12 | 36 |
| 2021-10 | 42 |
| 2021-07 | 40 |
| 2021-04 | 43 |
| 2021-03 | 46 |
| 2021-01 | 46 |
| 2020-12 | 48 |
| 2020-10 | 47 |
| 2020-09 | 48 |
| 2020-07 | 47 |
| 2020-04 | 43 |
| 2020-03 | 42 |
| 2020-01 | 44 |
| 2019-12 | 46 |
| 2019-10 | 45 |
| 2019-07 | 44 |
| 2019-06 | 43 |
| 2019-04 | 44 |
| 2019-03 | 46 |
| 2019-02 | 48 |
| 2019-01 | 50 |