Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI
Executive Summary
Minneapolis's housing market shows average risk, ranking 179th of 287 metros. The market recently entered Expansion. Current conditions are balanced with stable liquidity. Broad-based growth with healthy fundamentals.
Minneapolis experienced a market correction from early 2023 through early 2023. The market has since normalized and entered Expansion.
Inventory is growing at a moderate +8% pace with homes taking -2% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Rent growth is roughly keeping pace with price appreciation, suggesting valuations are not stretched.
Cycle Phase
Normal growth conditions with balanced fundamentals
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by migration and permits per capita, while affordability provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory is growing at a moderate +8% pace with homes taking -2% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Normal expansion. Credit is available, transactions are healthy — no constraints on current growth momentum.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
Sharp CoolingRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Significant supply pullback into healthy demand. A supply constraint is forming — pricing power is shifting to existing inventory holders.
Employment Concentration
Employment
ModerateInternal Structure
Minneapolis's 15 counties show moderate divergence — Dakota County carries the most risk (Elevated) while Ramsey County anchors the lower end.
Minneapolis, MN-WI shows Moderate internal divergence — some counties diverge meaningfully from the metro picture. Dakota County contributes the most structural risk (Elevated, driven by affordability), while Ramsey County anchors the lower end (Below Average).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Wright County<5% | 72 |
Chisago County<5% | 64 |
Dakota CountyRisk Driver | 62 |
Washington County | 60 |
St. Croix County<5% | 55 |
Anoka County | 54 |
Carver County<5% | 50 |
Sherburne County<5% | 48 |
Hennepin County | 48 |
Le Sueur County<5% | 45 |
Mille Lacs County<5% | 45 |
Scott County<5% | 43 |
Pierce County<5% | 36 |
Isanti County<5% | 34 |
Ramsey CountyStabilizer | 34 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2025-11 | 42 |
| 2025-09 | 41 |
| 2025-07 | 45 |
| 2025-06 | 44 |
| 2025-04 | 44 |
| 2025-01 | 43 |
| 2024-11 | 42 |
| 2024-10 | 41 |
| 2024-08 | 42 |
| 2024-07 | 42 |
| 2024-05 | 42 |
| 2024-03 | 40 |
| 2024-01 | 43 |
| 2023-11 | 41 |
| 2023-08 | 44 |
| 2023-06 | 44 |
| 2023-03 | 40 |
| 2023-01 | 42 |
| 2022-12 | 44 |
| 2022-10 | 42 |
| 2022-08 | 42 |
| 2022-07 | 41 |
| 2022-05 | 43 |
| 2022-03 | 43 |
| 2022-01 | 42 |
| 2021-12 | 36 |
| 2021-10 | 42 |
| 2021-07 | 40 |
| 2021-04 | 43 |
| 2021-03 | 46 |
| 2021-01 | 46 |
| 2020-12 | 48 |
| 2020-10 | 47 |
| 2020-09 | 48 |
| 2020-07 | 47 |
| 2020-04 | 43 |
| 2020-03 | 42 |
| 2020-01 | 44 |
| 2019-12 | 46 |
| 2019-10 | 45 |
| 2019-07 | 44 |
| 2019-06 | 43 |
| 2019-04 | 44 |
| 2019-03 | 46 |
| 2019-02 | 48 |
| 2019-01 | 50 |