Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI
Cycle Phase
Minneapolis experienced a market correction from early 2023 through early 2023. The market has since normalized and entered Expansion.
Normal growth conditions with balanced fundamentals
Minneapolis's housing market shows average risk, ranking 168th of 287 metros. The market recently entered Expansion. Current conditions are balanced with stable liquidity.
Executive Summary
Risk is Neutral, driven primarily by migration and price momentum. The market is in Expansion phase. Liquidity is stable and valuation is balanced.
Top Risk Drivers (This Month)
Market Signals
Inventory is growing at a moderate +8% pace with homes taking -2% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
Factor Breakdown
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
Underlying Values
| Metric | Value | Pctile |
|---|---|---|
| Price Momentum | +2.5% | p52 |
| Permit Growth | -8.7% | p36 |
| Permits/1K Pop | 3.74 | p49 |
| Affordability | 0.22 | p9 |
| Employment | +0.6% | p37 |
| Net AGI Migration | -$1M | p97 |
National ContextDoes not affect score
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Normal expansion. Credit is available, transactions are healthy — no constraints on current growth momentum.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local SignalsDoes not affect score
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
Sharp CoolingRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Significant supply pullback into healthy demand. A supply constraint is forming — pricing power is shifting to existing inventory holders.
Liquidity
Liquidity
Internal Structure
Minneapolis's 15 counties show moderate divergence — Anoka County carries the most risk (Elevated) while Pierce County anchors the lower end.
Minneapolis, MN-WI shows Moderate internal divergence — some counties diverge meaningfully from the metro picture. Anoka County contributes the most structural risk (Elevated, driven by permit growth), while Pierce County anchors the lower end (Below Average).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Anoka CountyRisk Driver | 67 |
St. Croix County | 62 |
Dakota County | 62 |
Wright County | 62 |
Le Sueur County | 60 |
Chisago County | 57 |
Washington County | 57 |
Hennepin County | 57 |
Sherburne County | 55 |
Ramsey County | 43 |
Scott County | 40 |
Carver County | 36 |
Mille Lacs County | 33 |
Isanti County | 31 |
Pierce CountyStabilizer | 28 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2025-11 | 42 |
| 2025-09 | 41 |
| 2025-07 | 45 |
| 2025-06 | 44 |
| 2025-04 | 44 |
| 2025-01 | 43 |
| 2024-11 | 42 |
| 2024-10 | 41 |
| 2024-08 | 42 |
| 2024-07 | 42 |
| 2024-05 | 42 |
| 2024-03 | 40 |
| 2024-01 | 43 |
| 2023-11 | 41 |
| 2023-08 | 44 |
| 2023-06 | 44 |
| 2023-03 | 40 |
| 2023-01 | 42 |
| 2022-12 | 44 |
| 2022-10 | 42 |
| 2022-08 | 42 |
| 2022-07 | 41 |
| 2022-05 | 43 |
| 2022-03 | 43 |
| 2022-01 | 42 |
| 2021-12 | 36 |
| 2021-10 | 42 |
| 2021-07 | 40 |
| 2021-04 | 43 |
| 2021-03 | 46 |
| 2021-01 | 46 |
| 2020-12 | 48 |
| 2020-10 | 47 |
| 2020-09 | 48 |
| 2020-07 | 47 |
| 2020-04 | 43 |
| 2020-03 | 42 |
| 2020-01 | 44 |
| 2019-12 | 46 |
| 2019-10 | 45 |
| 2019-07 | 44 |
| 2019-06 | 43 |
| 2019-04 | 44 |
| 2019-03 | 46 |
| 2019-02 | 48 |
| 2019-01 | 50 |