Executive Summary
Madison's housing market shows elevated risk, ranking 8th of 273 metros. The market recently entered Recovery. Inventory is growing moderately (+10% YoY) with stable liquidity. Early signs of stabilization — conditions may favor patient buyers.
Madison experienced a market correction from mid-2025 through mid-2025. The market is currently recovering.
Inventory is growing at a moderate +10% pace with homes taking +9% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Rent growth is roughly keeping pace with price appreciation, suggesting valuations are not stretched.
Cycle Phase
Market conditions are rebuilding after a correction period
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by employment and permits per capita, while affordability provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory is growing at a moderate +10% pace with homes taking +9% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Healthy recovery. Credit is flowing normally and transactions are steady — conditions favor continued rebuilding.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
NormalRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Supply and demand are in equilibrium. No unusual activity on either side of the market.
Employment Concentration
Employment
ModerateInternal Structure
Madison's 4 counties show moderate divergence — Dane County carries the most risk (Elevated) while Columbia County anchors the lower end.
Madison, WI shows Moderate internal divergence — some counties diverge meaningfully from the metro picture. Dane County contributes the most structural risk (Elevated, driven by permit growth), while Columbia County anchors the lower end (Below Average).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Dane CountyRisk Driver | 75 |
Green County | 50 |
Columbia CountyStabilizer | 42 |
Iowa County<5% | 33 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2026-06 | 68 |
| 2025-12 | 62 |
| 2025-11 | 63 |
| 2025-09 | 66 |
| 2025-07 | 70 |
| 2025-06 | 70 |
| 2025-04 | 61 |
| 2025-02 | 67 |
| 2025-01 | 60 |
| 2024-11 | 63 |
| 2024-09 | 62 |
| 2024-08 | 58 |
| 2024-06 | 61 |
| 2024-03 | 59 |
| 2024-02 | 60 |
| 2023-12 | 63 |
| 2023-09 | 60 |
| 2023-08 | 61 |
| 2023-06 | 64 |
| 2023-03 | 53 |
| 2023-02 | 56 |
| 2022-12 | 57 |
| 2022-11 | 56 |
| 2022-10 | 57 |
| 2022-09 | 62 |
| 2022-07 | 62 |
| 2022-06 | 61 |
| 2022-04 | 60 |
| 2022-01 | 57 |
| 2021-11 | 54 |
| 2021-10 | 55 |
| 2021-08 | 53 |
| 2021-05 | 55 |
| 2021-03 | 54 |
| 2021-01 | 53 |
| 2020-10 | 53 |
| 2020-07 | 53 |
| 2020-06 | 55 |
| 2020-04 | 52 |
| 2020-03 | 50 |
| 2020-01 | 52 |
| 2019-12 | 53 |
| 2019-10 | 52 |
| 2019-09 | 55 |
| 2019-07 | 53 |
| 2019-04 | 52 |
| 2019-03 | 54 |
| 2019-01 | 57 |