Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR
Executive Summary
Little Rock's housing market shows below-average risk, ranking 261st of 273 metros. The market recently entered Hypersupply. Inventory levels are elevated, warranting monitoring. Inventory accumulating faster than demand — the market is shifting toward buyers.
Little Rock experienced a market correction from early 2025 through mid-2025. Elevated inventory persists, suggesting the market hasn't fully normalized.
Inventory is elevated (+16% YoY) and days on market are up +4% — supply is building but not yet at stress levels.
Rent growth is roughly keeping pace with price appreciation, suggesting valuations are not stretched.
Cycle Phase
Building activity may be outpacing demand absorption
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by migration and permits per capita, while permit growth provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory is elevated (+16% YoY) and days on market are up +4% — supply is building but not yet at stress levels.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Oversupply with deteriorating transactions and no credit excuse. Supply-driven correction risk is elevated.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
NormalRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Permit activity is typical but demand is softening. Price pressure is forming on the demand side — this is not a supply problem.
Employment Concentration
Employment
Limited dataInternal Structure
Little Rock's 5 counties show moderate divergence — Pulaski County carries the most risk (Elevated) while Lonoke County anchors the lower end.
Little Rock, AR shows Moderate internal divergence — some counties diverge meaningfully from the metro picture. Pulaski County contributes the most structural risk (Elevated, driven by permit growth), while Lonoke County anchors the lower end (Low Risk).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Pulaski CountyRisk Driver | 75 |
Faulkner County | 62 |
Perry CountyUnscored | 50 |
Grant County<5% | 44 |
Saline County | 44 |
Lonoke CountyStabilizer | 25 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2026-06 | 37 |
| 2025-12 | 42 |
| 2025-10 | 39 |
| 2025-08 | 37 |
| 2025-07 | 36 |
| 2025-05 | 34 |
| 2025-04 | 33 |
| 2025-02 | 40 |
| 2025-01 | 41 |
| 2024-11 | 35 |
| 2024-08 | 37 |
| 2024-06 | 36 |
| 2024-03 | 39 |
| 2023-12 | 42 |
| 2023-09 | 40 |
| 2023-08 | 41 |
| 2023-06 | 43 |
| 2023-04 | 43 |
| 2023-03 | 43 |
| 2023-01 | 43 |
| 2022-10 | 41 |
| 2022-09 | 39 |
| 2022-08 | 41 |
| 2022-06 | 39 |
| 2022-04 | 40 |
| 2022-01 | 38 |
| 2021-10 | 42 |
| 2021-07 | 43 |
| 2021-04 | 46 |
| 2021-02 | 40 |
| 2020-11 | 38 |
| 2020-08 | 39 |
| 2020-05 | 37 |
| 2020-04 | 37 |
| 2020-02 | 50 |
| 2019-11 | 47 |
| 2019-09 | 49 |
| 2019-06 | 45 |
| 2019-03 | 39 |
| 2019-01 | 42 |