Lansing-East Lansing, MI
Executive Summary
Lansing's housing market shows average risk, ranking 83rd of 287 metros. The market has been in Recovery for 6 months. Current conditions are balanced with stable liquidity. Early signs of stabilization — conditions may favor patient buyers.
Lansing experienced a market correction from mid-2025 through mid-2025. The market is currently recovering.
Inventory is roughly flat (+0% YoY) with homes selling at a normal pace — a balanced market.
Rent growth is roughly keeping pace with price appreciation, suggesting valuations are not stretched.
Cycle Phase
Market conditions are rebuilding after a correction period
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by migration and permit growth, while permits per capita provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory is roughly flat (+0% YoY) with homes selling at a normal pace — a balanced market.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Healthy recovery. Credit is flowing normally and transactions are steady — conditions favor continued rebuilding.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
SurgeRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Based on limited permit volume
Permit activity is surging and demand is absorbing it. Both sides of the market are running hot — monitor for overheating if liquidity shifts.
Employment Concentration
Employment
ModerateInternal Structure
Lansing's 3 counties show moderate divergence — Clinton County carries the most risk (Elevated) while Ingham County anchors the lower end.
Lansing, MI shows Moderate internal divergence — some counties diverge meaningfully from the metro picture. Clinton County contributes the most structural risk (Elevated, driven by permits per capita), while Ingham County anchors the lower end (Below Average).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Clinton CountyRisk Driver | 62 |
Eaton County | 50 |
Ingham CountyStabilizer | 38 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2025-11 | 40 |
| 2025-09 | 34 |
| 2025-06 | 31 |
| 2025-04 | 31 |
| 2025-03 | 36 |
| 2025-01 | 37 |
| 2024-12 | 36 |
| 2024-11 | 36 |
| 2024-09 | 44 |
| 2024-07 | 43 |
| 2024-05 | 46 |
| 2024-04 | 40 |
| 2024-03 | 33 |
| 2024-01 | 36 |
| 2023-11 | 37 |
| 2023-08 | 32 |
| 2023-06 | 33 |
| 2023-04 | 31 |
| 2023-02 | 24 |
| 2022-12 | 26 |
| 2022-11 | 25 |
| 2022-10 | 26 |
| 2022-08 | 24 |
| 2022-07 | 29 |
| 2022-05 | 28 |
| 2022-02 | 34 |
| 2022-01 | 37 |
| 2021-11 | 34 |
| 2021-09 | 37 |
| 2021-07 | 35 |
| 2021-04 | 30 |
| 2021-03 | 42 |
| 2021-01 | 44 |
| 2020-10 | 39 |
| 2020-07 | 42 |
| 2020-04 | 44 |
| 2020-02 | 39 |
| 2019-12 | 44 |
| 2019-09 | 42 |
| 2019-07 | 42 |
| 2019-06 | 39 |
| 2019-04 | 40 |
| 2019-03 | 41 |
| 2019-01 | 41 |