La Crosse-Onalaska, WI-MN
Executive Summary
La Crosse's housing market shows elevated risk, ranking 28th of 287 metros. The market recently entered Expansion. Inventory is growing moderately (+10% YoY) with stable liquidity. Broad-based growth with healthy fundamentals. Valuations are also showing some stretch.
La Crosse experienced a market correction from early 2025 through early 2025. The market has since normalized and entered Expansion.
Inventory is growing at a moderate +10% pace with homes taking +0% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Home prices are outpacing rents (-3.9% rent-price ratio change), indicating some valuation compression.
Cycle Phase
Normal growth conditions with balanced fundamentals
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by price momentum and permit growth, while employment provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory is growing at a moderate +10% pace with homes taking +0% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Normal expansion. Credit is available, transactions are healthy — no constraints on current growth momentum.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
NormalRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Based on limited permit volume
Supply and demand are in equilibrium. No unusual activity on either side of the market.
Employment Concentration
Employment
ModerateInternal Structure
La Crosse's 3 counties show similar risk profiles — the metro-level score is broadly representative.
La Crosse, WI-MN shows Low internal divergence — county-level differences are minor and the metro composite is broadly representative. Vernon County contributes the most structural risk (Elevated, driven by permit growth), while Houston County anchors the lower end (Below Average).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Vernon CountyRisk Driver | 62 |
La Crosse County | 50 |
Houston CountyStabilizer | 38 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2025-11 | 67 |
| 2025-10 | 69 |
| 2025-08 | 67 |
| 2025-07 | 58 |
| 2025-05 | 61 |
| 2025-03 | 56 |
| 2025-01 | 54 |
| 2024-12 | 56 |
| 2024-11 | 52 |
| 2024-09 | 62 |
| 2024-08 | 66 |
| 2024-07 | 68 |
| 2024-05 | 67 |
| 2024-04 | 68 |
| 2024-03 | 72 |
| 2024-01 | 72 |
| 2023-12 | 72 |
| 2023-11 | 71 |
| 2023-09 | 69 |
| 2023-07 | 62 |
| 2023-05 | 58 |
| 2023-04 | 55 |
| 2023-03 | 51 |
| 2023-01 | 55 |
| 2022-10 | 55 |
| 2022-08 | 60 |
| 2022-07 | 62 |
| 2022-05 | 67 |
| 2022-04 | 66 |
| 2022-02 | 62 |
| 2022-01 | 60 |
| 2021-11 | 61 |
| 2021-08 | 56 |
| 2021-05 | 53 |
| 2021-03 | 57 |
| 2021-01 | 55 |
| 2020-10 | 54 |
| 2020-08 | 56 |
| 2020-07 | 57 |
| 2020-05 | 56 |
| 2020-02 | 58 |
| 2019-12 | 65 |
| 2019-10 | 63 |
| 2019-08 | 63 |
| 2019-07 | 65 |
| 2019-05 | 65 |
| 2019-03 | 61 |
| 2019-01 | 67 |