Kansas City, MO-KS
Cycle Phase
Kansas City experienced a market correction from mid-2025 through late 2025. The market is currently recovering.
Market conditions are rebuilding after a correction period
Kansas City's housing market shows elevated risk, ranking 37th of 287 metros. The market has been in Recovery for 5 months. Inventory levels are elevated, warranting monitoring.
Executive Summary
Risk is Elevated, driven primarily by migration and employment. The market is in Recovery phase. Liquidity is watch and valuation is balanced.
Top Risk Drivers (This Month)
Market Signals
Inventory is elevated (+15% YoY) and days on market are up -3% — supply is building but not yet at stress levels.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
Factor Breakdown
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
Underlying Values
| Metric | Value | Pctile |
|---|---|---|
| Price Momentum | +3.1% | p60 |
| Permit Growth | -1.3% | p51 |
| Permits/1K Pop | 4.21 | p53 |
| Affordability | 0.26 | p35 |
| Employment | -0.3% | p78 |
| Net AGI Migration | -$183K | p90 |
National ContextDoes not affect score
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Early-stage recovery with lingering transaction weakness. Credit is available but buyer activity hasn't fully returned yet.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local SignalsDoes not affect score
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
NormalRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Permit activity is typical but demand is softening. Price pressure is forming on the demand side — this is not a supply problem.
Liquidity
Liquidity
Internal Structure
Kansas City's 14 counties show moderate divergence — Leavenworth County carries the most risk (Elevated) while Caldwell County anchors the lower end.
Kansas City, MO-KS shows Moderate internal divergence — some counties diverge meaningfully from the metro picture. Leavenworth County contributes the most structural risk (Elevated, driven by permit growth), while Caldwell County anchors the lower end (Low Risk).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Leavenworth CountyRisk Driver | 74 |
Clay County | 70 |
Johnson County | 61 |
Platte County | 61 |
Jackson County | 61 |
Linn County | 59 |
Wyandotte County | 59 |
Miami County | 54 |
Cass County | 51 |
Lafayette County | 46 |
Clinton County | 36 |
Bates County | 31 |
Ray County | 26 |
Caldwell CountyStabilizer | 10 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2025-11 | 64 |
| 2025-09 | 66 |
| 2025-07 | 61 |
| 2025-05 | 63 |
| 2025-04 | 64 |
| 2025-02 | 63 |
| 2025-01 | 62 |
| 2024-11 | 58 |
| 2024-09 | 56 |
| 2024-07 | 61 |
| 2024-04 | 56 |
| 2024-03 | 57 |
| 2024-01 | 63 |
| 2023-10 | 61 |
| 2023-08 | 64 |
| 2023-06 | 58 |
| 2023-05 | 58 |
| 2023-03 | 57 |
| 2023-02 | 60 |
| 2022-12 | 56 |
| 2022-09 | 56 |
| 2022-07 | 59 |
| 2022-04 | 60 |
| 2022-02 | 59 |
| 2022-01 | 63 |
| 2021-11 | 56 |
| 2021-10 | 56 |
| 2021-08 | 59 |
| 2021-05 | 63 |
| 2021-04 | 61 |
| 2021-02 | 58 |
| 2021-01 | 57 |
| 2020-11 | 52 |
| 2020-09 | 53 |
| 2020-07 | 51 |
| 2020-04 | 51 |
| 2020-01 | 50 |
| 2019-10 | 60 |
| 2019-07 | 62 |
| 2019-04 | 60 |
| 2019-02 | 64 |
| 2019-01 | 63 |