Executive Summary
Jackson's housing market shows average risk, ranking 69th of 287 metros. The market recently entered Hypersupply. Inventory levels are elevated, warranting monitoring. Inventory accumulating faster than demand — the market is shifting toward buyers.
Jackson experienced a market correction from early 2025 through mid-2025. Elevated inventory persists, suggesting the market hasn't fully normalized.
Inventory is elevated (+24% YoY) and days on market are up +6% — supply is building but not yet at stress levels.
Rent growth is roughly keeping pace with price appreciation, suggesting valuations are not stretched.
Cycle Phase
Building activity may be outpacing demand absorption
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by employment and price momentum, while permits per capita provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory is elevated (+24% YoY) and days on market are up +6% — supply is building but not yet at stress levels.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Oversupply with deteriorating transactions and no credit excuse. Supply-driven correction risk is elevated.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
NormalRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Based on limited permit volume
Permit activity is typical but demand is softening. Price pressure is forming on the demand side — this is not a supply problem.
Employment Concentration
Employment
Limited dataInternal Structure
Jackson's 4 counties show similar risk profiles — the metro-level score is broadly representative.
Jackson, TN shows Low internal divergence — county-level differences are minor and the metro composite is broadly representative. Madison County contributes the most structural risk (Elevated, driven by affordability), while Crockett County anchors the lower end (Below Average).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Madison CountyRisk Driver | 58 |
Chester County | 50 |
Gibson County | 50 |
Crockett CountyStabilizer | 42 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2025-11 | 44 |
| 2025-10 | 44 |
| 2025-08 | 45 |
| 2025-06 | 43 |
| 2025-04 | 40 |
| 2025-01 | 48 |
| 2024-11 | 58 |
| 2024-10 | 52 |
| 2024-08 | 56 |
| 2024-07 | 56 |
| 2024-06 | 59 |
| 2024-04 | 61 |
| 2024-03 | 52 |
| 2024-01 | 52 |
| 2023-11 | 51 |
| 2023-09 | 46 |
| 2023-07 | 45 |
| 2023-06 | 48 |
| 2023-04 | 53 |
| 2023-03 | 58 |
| 2023-01 | 58 |
| 2022-10 | 60 |
| 2022-09 | 58 |
| 2022-07 | 60 |
| 2022-05 | 58 |
| 2022-03 | 62 |
| 2022-02 | 61 |
| 2021-12 | 61 |
| 2021-09 | 56 |
| 2021-06 | 58 |
| 2021-04 | 56 |
| 2021-02 | 36 |
| 2021-01 | 35 |
| 2020-11 | 36 |
| 2020-10 | 38 |
| 2020-08 | 41 |
| 2020-05 | 31 |
| 2020-04 | 30 |
| 2020-02 | 45 |
| 2019-12 | 38 |
| 2019-10 | 36 |
| 2019-08 | 39 |
| 2019-06 | 50 |
| 2019-03 | 47 |
| 2019-01 | 47 |