Jackson, MS
Executive Summary
Jackson's housing market shows average risk, ranking 155th of 273 metros. The market recently entered Recovery. Current conditions are balanced with stable liquidity. Early signs of stabilization — conditions may favor patient buyers.
Jackson experienced a market correction from early 2025 through early 2025. The market is currently recovering.
Inventory is growing at a moderate +6% pace with homes taking +3% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Rent growth is roughly keeping pace with price appreciation, suggesting valuations are not stretched.
Cycle Phase
Market conditions are rebuilding after a correction period
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by permit growth and migration, while price momentum provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory is growing at a moderate +6% pace with homes taking +3% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Healthy recovery. Credit is flowing normally and transactions are steady — conditions favor continued rebuilding.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
SurgeRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Permit activity is surging and demand is absorbing it. Both sides of the market are running hot — monitor for overheating if liquidity shifts.
Employment Concentration
Employment
Limited dataInternal Structure
Jackson's 7 counties show similar risk profiles — the metro-level score is broadly representative.
Jackson, MS shows Low internal divergence — county-level differences are minor and the metro composite is broadly representative. Rankin County contributes the most structural risk (Elevated, driven by affordability), while Madison County anchors the lower end (Elevated).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Rankin CountyRisk Driver | 66 |
Hinds County | 62 |
Yazoo County<5% | 58 |
Madison CountyStabilizer | 58 |
Holmes CountyUnscored | 50 |
Simpson County<5% | 46 |
Scott County<5% | 29 |
Copiah County<5% | 29 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2026-06 | 65 |
| 2025-12 | 44 |
| 2025-09 | 36 |
| 2025-07 | 40 |
| 2025-05 | 40 |
| 2025-03 | 40 |
| 2025-01 | 38 |
| 2024-11 | 42 |
| 2024-08 | 49 |
| 2024-07 | 53 |
| 2024-05 | 52 |
| 2024-04 | 53 |
| 2024-03 | 54 |
| 2024-01 | 46 |
| 2023-11 | 49 |
| 2023-08 | 44 |
| 2023-05 | 38 |
| 2023-03 | 52 |
| 2023-01 | 48 |
| 2022-10 | 46 |
| 2022-07 | 46 |
| 2022-05 | 47 |
| 2022-04 | 48 |
| 2022-02 | 48 |
| 2021-11 | 52 |
| 2021-08 | 50 |
| 2021-05 | 46 |
| 2021-03 | 42 |
| 2020-12 | 38 |
| 2020-09 | 42 |
| 2020-06 | 44 |
| 2020-04 | 44 |
| 2020-02 | 54 |
| 2020-01 | 54 |
| 2019-11 | 55 |
| 2019-09 | 51 |
| 2019-07 | 51 |
| 2019-06 | 52 |
| 2019-04 | 54 |
| 2019-03 | 52 |
| 2019-01 | 51 |