Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA
Executive Summary
Harrisburg's housing market shows below-average risk, ranking 238th of 287 metros. The market recently entered Recovery. Inventory is growing moderately (+13% YoY) with stable liquidity. Early signs of stabilization — conditions may favor patient buyers.
Harrisburg experienced a market correction from mid-2025 through mid-2025. The market is currently recovering.
Inventory is growing at a moderate +13% pace with homes taking +14% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Rent growth is roughly keeping pace with price appreciation, suggesting valuations are not stretched.
Cycle Phase
Market conditions are rebuilding after a correction period
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by price momentum and migration, while affordability provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory is growing at a moderate +13% pace with homes taking +14% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Healthy recovery. Credit is flowing normally and transactions are steady — conditions favor continued rebuilding.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
Sharp CoolingRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Significant supply pullback into healthy demand. A supply constraint is forming — pricing power is shifting to existing inventory holders.
Employment Concentration
Employment
ModerateInternal Structure
Harrisburg's counties diverge significantly — Perry County (Elevated) contrasts sharply with Dauphin County, making the metro average potentially misleading.
Harrisburg, PA shows High internal divergence — the metro composite may obscure significant county-level differences. Perry County contributes the most structural risk (Elevated, driven by price momentum), while Dauphin County anchors the lower end (Low Risk).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Cumberland County | 62 |
Perry CountyRisk Driver | 62 |
Dauphin CountyStabilizer | 25 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2025-11 | 41 |
| 2025-09 | 39 |
| 2025-08 | 39 |
| 2025-06 | 42 |
| 2025-04 | 42 |
| 2025-03 | 36 |
| 2025-02 | 35 |
| 2025-01 | 36 |
| 2024-12 | 35 |
| 2024-10 | 39 |
| 2024-09 | 41 |
| 2024-07 | 44 |
| 2024-06 | 41 |
| 2024-04 | 46 |
| 2024-03 | 45 |
| 2024-01 | 43 |
| 2023-10 | 42 |
| 2023-07 | 47 |
| 2023-05 | 43 |
| 2023-03 | 42 |
| 2023-01 | 40 |
| 2022-12 | 37 |
| 2022-11 | 37 |
| 2022-10 | 36 |
| 2022-08 | 34 |
| 2022-06 | 34 |
| 2022-05 | 35 |
| 2022-03 | 38 |
| 2022-02 | 38 |
| 2021-12 | 31 |
| 2021-11 | 34 |
| 2021-09 | 34 |
| 2021-06 | 26 |
| 2021-03 | 34 |
| 2020-12 | 34 |
| 2020-10 | 35 |
| 2020-09 | 37 |
| 2020-07 | 36 |
| 2020-05 | 36 |
| 2020-03 | 38 |
| 2019-12 | 30 |
| 2019-10 | 28 |
| 2019-09 | 31 |
| 2019-07 | 29 |
| 2019-06 | 28 |
| 2019-04 | 30 |
| 2019-03 | 28 |
| 2019-01 | 28 |