Gulfport-Biloxi, MS
Executive Summary
Gulfport's housing market shows elevated risk, ranking 31st of 287 metros. The market has been in Expansion for 4 months. Current conditions are balanced with stable liquidity. Broad-based growth with healthy fundamentals.
Gulfport experienced a market correction from late 2023 through mid-2024. The market has since normalized and entered Expansion.
Inventory is roughly flat (+4% YoY) with homes selling at a normal pace — a balanced market.
Rent growth is roughly keeping pace with price appreciation, suggesting valuations are not stretched.
Cycle Phase
Normal growth conditions with balanced fundamentals
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by permits per capita and permit growth, while migration provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory is roughly flat (+4% YoY) with homes selling at a normal pace — a balanced market.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Normal expansion. Credit is available, transactions are healthy — no constraints on current growth momentum.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
NormalRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Supply and demand are in equilibrium. No unusual activity on either side of the market.
Employment Concentration
Employment
ConcentratedInternal Structure
Gulfport's counties diverge significantly — Harrison County (High Risk) contrasts sharply with Jackson County, making the metro average potentially misleading.
Gulfport, MS shows High internal divergence — the metro composite may obscure significant county-level differences. Harrison County contributes the most structural risk (High Risk, driven by permit growth), while Jackson County anchors the lower end (Low Risk).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Harrison CountyRisk Driver | 92 |
Hancock County | 42 |
Stone County<5% | 42 |
Jackson CountyStabilizer | 25 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2025-11 | 59 |
| 2025-09 | 59 |
| 2025-08 | 56 |
| 2025-06 | 40 |
| 2025-05 | 44 |
| 2025-03 | 61 |
| 2025-02 | 54 |
| 2024-12 | 52 |
| 2024-09 | 49 |
| 2024-06 | 51 |
| 2024-05 | 47 |
| 2024-03 | 46 |
| 2023-12 | 59 |
| 2023-11 | 54 |
| 2023-09 | 44 |
| 2023-08 | 43 |
| 2023-07 | 44 |
| 2023-05 | 58 |
| 2023-02 | 58 |
| 2022-12 | 63 |
| 2022-09 | 60 |
| 2022-07 | 60 |
| 2022-05 | 56 |
| 2022-04 | 55 |
| 2022-02 | 51 |
| 2022-01 | 50 |
| 2021-11 | 52 |
| 2021-10 | 48 |
| 2021-08 | 52 |
| 2021-05 | 39 |
| 2021-04 | 40 |
| 2021-02 | 46 |
| 2020-12 | 52 |
| 2020-10 | 50 |
| 2020-09 | 50 |
| 2020-07 | 54 |
| 2020-05 | 59 |
| 2020-03 | 41 |
| 2020-02 | 43 |
| 2019-12 | 48 |
| 2019-09 | 56 |
| 2019-07 | 60 |
| 2019-06 | 60 |
| 2019-04 | 60 |
| 2019-03 | 65 |
| 2019-01 | 62 |