Greensboro-High Point, NC
Cycle Phase
Greensboro experienced a market correction from early 2025 through mid-2025. Elevated inventory persists, suggesting the market hasn't fully normalized.
Building activity may be outpacing demand absorption
Greensboro's housing market shows average risk, ranking 234th of 287 metros. The market has been in Hypersupply for 6 months. The market shows signs of liquidity stress with elevated inventory.
Executive Summary
Risk is Neutral, driven primarily by permits per capita and migration. The market is in Hypersupply phase. Liquidity is stress and valuation is balanced.
Top Risk Drivers (This Month)
Market Signals
Inventory has surged +26% YoY with days on market up +17% — significant supply buildup indicating market stress.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
Factor Breakdown
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
Underlying Values
| Metric | Value | Pctile |
|---|---|---|
| Price Momentum | +1.7% | p36 |
| Permit Growth | -22.1% | p16 |
| Permits/1K Pop | 4.91 | p59 |
| Affordability | 0.27 | p44 |
| Employment | +0.5% | p39 |
| Net AGI Migration | +$8K | p53 |
National ContextDoes not affect score
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Oversupply with deteriorating transactions and no credit excuse. Supply-driven correction risk is elevated.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local SignalsDoes not affect score
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
CoolingRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Builders are already retreating and demand is weak. A correction may be underway — the market is contracting on both the supply and demand side.
Liquidity
Liquidity
Internal Structure
Greensboro's counties diverge significantly — Randolph County (High Risk) contrasts sharply with Rockingham County, making the metro average potentially misleading.
Greensboro, NC shows High internal divergence — the metro composite may obscure significant county-level differences. Randolph County contributes the most structural risk (High Risk, driven by price momentum), while Rockingham County anchors the lower end (Low Risk).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Randolph CountyRisk Driver | 83 |
Guilford County | 67 |
Rockingham CountyStabilizer | 0 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2025-11 | 53 |
| 2025-09 | 54 |
| 2025-06 | 58 |
| 2025-04 | 62 |
| 2025-02 | 68 |
| 2024-12 | 66 |
| 2024-09 | 66 |
| 2024-07 | 64 |
| 2024-05 | 61 |
| 2024-02 | 64 |
| 2023-12 | 65 |
| 2023-10 | 66 |
| 2023-08 | 68 |
| 2023-06 | 69 |
| 2023-05 | 70 |
| 2023-03 | 72 |
| 2023-02 | 71 |
| 2022-12 | 69 |
| 2022-10 | 68 |
| 2022-09 | 69 |
| 2022-07 | 70 |
| 2022-05 | 67 |
| 2022-03 | 66 |
| 2022-02 | 67 |
| 2021-12 | 67 |
| 2021-11 | 66 |
| 2021-09 | 62 |
| 2021-06 | 60 |
| 2021-04 | 58 |
| 2021-02 | 58 |
| 2021-01 | 59 |
| 2020-11 | 60 |
| 2020-10 | 60 |
| 2020-08 | 65 |
| 2020-05 | 66 |
| 2020-03 | 66 |
| 2020-02 | 68 |
| 2019-12 | 65 |
| 2019-10 | 64 |
| 2019-08 | 65 |
| 2019-05 | 64 |
| 2019-02 | 60 |
| 2019-01 | 61 |