Fort Smith, AR-OK
Executive Summary
Fort Smith's housing market shows average risk, ranking 44th of 287 metros. The market recently entered Hypersupply. Inventory levels are elevated, warranting monitoring. Inventory accumulating faster than demand — the market is shifting toward buyers.
Fort Smith experienced a market correction from mid-2025 through late 2025. Elevated inventory persists, suggesting the market hasn't fully normalized.
Inventory is elevated (+28% YoY) and days on market are up +1% — supply is building but not yet at stress levels.
Rent growth is roughly keeping pace with price appreciation, suggesting valuations are not stretched.
Cycle Phase
Building activity may be outpacing demand absorption
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by permit growth and affordability, while employment provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory is elevated (+28% YoY) and days on market are up +1% — supply is building but not yet at stress levels.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Oversupply with deteriorating transactions and no credit excuse. Supply-driven correction risk is elevated.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
ElevatedRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Building is elevated but demand is cooling. Early warning of supply-demand imbalance — if liquidity continues to soften, this pipeline could become a problem.
Employment Concentration
Employment
ModerateInternal Structure
Fort Smith's counties diverge significantly — Sebastian County (Elevated) contrasts sharply with Crawford County, making the metro average potentially misleading.
Fort Smith, AR-OK shows High internal divergence — the metro composite may obscure significant county-level differences. Sebastian County contributes the most structural risk (Elevated, driven by price momentum), while Crawford County anchors the lower end (Low Risk).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Sebastian CountyRisk Driver | 75 |
Sequoyah County | 50 |
Crawford CountyStabilizer | 25 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2025-11 | 34 |
| 2025-09 | 40 |
| 2025-07 | 43 |
| 2025-05 | 46 |
| 2025-04 | 46 |
| 2025-02 | 55 |
| 2024-12 | 52 |
| 2024-11 | 51 |
| 2024-10 | 49 |
| 2024-08 | 54 |
| 2024-06 | 52 |
| 2024-04 | 50 |
| 2024-01 | 46 |
| 2023-11 | 49 |
| 2023-09 | 50 |
| 2023-07 | 52 |
| 2023-06 | 55 |
| 2023-04 | 51 |
| 2023-02 | 56 |
| 2022-12 | 56 |
| 2022-10 | 54 |
| 2022-09 | 49 |
| 2022-07 | 50 |
| 2022-06 | 54 |
| 2022-04 | 57 |
| 2022-01 | 54 |
| 2021-11 | 54 |
| 2021-10 | 53 |
| 2021-08 | 57 |
| 2021-05 | 54 |
| 2021-03 | 40 |
| 2021-01 | 35 |
| 2020-10 | 37 |
| 2020-07 | 34 |
| 2020-04 | 33 |
| 2020-02 | 48 |
| 2020-01 | 48 |
| 2019-11 | 48 |
| 2019-10 | 49 |
| 2019-08 | 46 |
| 2019-07 | 45 |
| 2019-05 | 56 |
| 2019-03 | 53 |
| 2019-01 | 50 |