Durham-Chapel Hill, NC
Executive Summary
Durham's housing market shows average risk, ranking 38th of 274 metros. The market recently entered Recovery. Inventory is growing moderately (+10% YoY) with stable liquidity. Early signs of stabilization — conditions may favor patient buyers.
Durham experienced a market correction from early 2025 through mid-2025. The market is currently recovering.
Inventory is growing at a moderate +10% pace with homes taking +10% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Rent growth is roughly keeping pace with price appreciation, suggesting valuations are not stretched.
Cycle Phase
Market conditions are rebuilding after a correction period
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by permits per capita and employment, while price momentum provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory is growing at a moderate +10% pace with homes taking +10% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Healthy recovery. Credit is flowing normally and transactions are steady — conditions favor continued rebuilding.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
NormalRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Supply and demand are in equilibrium. No unusual activity on either side of the market.
Employment Concentration
Employment
ModerateInternal Structure
Durham's 4 counties show moderate divergence — Orange County carries the most risk (Elevated) while Person County anchors the lower end.
Durham, NC shows Moderate internal divergence — some counties diverge meaningfully from the metro picture. Orange County contributes the most structural risk (Elevated, driven by permit growth), while Person County anchors the lower end (Low Risk).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Orange CountyRisk Driver | 75 |
Durham County | 67 |
Chatham County | 50 |
Person CountyStabilizer | 8 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2026-05 | 60 |
| 2025-12 | 47 |
| 2025-10 | 34 |
| 2025-07 | 35 |
| 2025-06 | 33 |
| 2025-04 | 36 |
| 2025-01 | 38 |
| 2024-12 | 39 |
| 2024-10 | 39 |
| 2024-08 | 46 |
| 2024-07 | 46 |
| 2024-05 | 40 |
| 2024-03 | 41 |
| 2024-01 | 42 |
| 2023-10 | 42 |
| 2023-09 | 39 |
| 2023-07 | 38 |
| 2023-06 | 44 |
| 2023-04 | 42 |
| 2023-02 | 46 |
| 2023-01 | 46 |
| 2022-12 | 51 |
| 2022-10 | 53 |
| 2022-07 | 52 |
| 2022-05 | 51 |
| 2022-04 | 51 |
| 2022-02 | 48 |
| 2021-12 | 46 |
| 2021-11 | 42 |
| 2021-09 | 41 |
| 2021-06 | 36 |
| 2021-05 | 44 |
| 2021-03 | 28 |
| 2021-02 | 30 |
| 2020-12 | 30 |
| 2020-11 | 32 |
| 2020-09 | 36 |
| 2020-06 | 36 |
| 2020-03 | 41 |
| 2019-12 | 33 |
| 2019-09 | 37 |
| 2019-07 | 44 |
| 2019-06 | 44 |
| 2019-04 | 44 |
| 2019-03 | 46 |
| 2019-01 | 43 |