Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO
Executive Summary
Denver's housing market shows below-average risk, ranking 247th of 273 metros. The market recently entered Expansion. Current conditions are balanced with stable liquidity. Broad-based growth with healthy fundamentals.
Denver experienced a market correction from early 2025 through early 2025. The market has since normalized and entered Expansion.
Inventory is roughly flat (+2% YoY) with homes selling at a normal pace — a balanced market.
Rent growth is roughly keeping pace with price appreciation, suggesting valuations are not stretched.
Cycle Phase
Normal growth conditions with balanced fundamentals
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by permits per capita and employment, while price momentum provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory is roughly flat (+2% YoY) with homes selling at a normal pace — a balanced market.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Normal expansion. Credit is available, transactions are healthy — no constraints on current growth momentum.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
NormalRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Supply and demand are in equilibrium. No unusual activity on either side of the market.
Employment Concentration
Employment
Limited dataInternal Structure
Denver's 10 counties show moderate divergence — Denver County carries the most risk (Elevated) while Jefferson County anchors the lower end.
Denver, CO shows Moderate internal divergence — some counties diverge meaningfully from the metro picture. Denver County contributes the most structural risk (Elevated, driven by affordability), while Jefferson County anchors the lower end (Below Average).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Broomfield County<5% | 84 |
Denver CountyRisk Driver | 70 |
Park County<5% | 56 |
Elbert County<5% | 56 |
Douglas County | 50 |
Arapahoe County | 47 |
Adams County | 44 |
Jefferson CountyStabilizer | 44 |
Clear Creek County<5% | 25 |
Gilpin County<5% | 25 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2026-06 | 36 |
| 2025-12 | 40 |
| 2025-11 | 35 |
| 2025-10 | 34 |
| 2025-08 | 38 |
| 2025-05 | 35 |
| 2025-03 | 38 |
| 2025-01 | 35 |
| 2024-12 | 36 |
| 2024-10 | 35 |
| 2024-07 | 35 |
| 2024-05 | 39 |
| 2024-02 | 36 |
| 2024-01 | 38 |
| 2023-11 | 38 |
| 2023-08 | 32 |
| 2023-06 | 32 |
| 2023-05 | 32 |
| 2023-03 | 32 |
| 2023-01 | 34 |
| 2022-11 | 30 |
| 2022-08 | 32 |
| 2022-05 | 40 |
| 2022-04 | 40 |
| 2022-02 | 40 |
| 2022-01 | 40 |
| 2021-11 | 38 |
| 2021-10 | 40 |
| 2021-08 | 42 |
| 2021-06 | 43 |
| 2021-04 | 47 |
| 2021-03 | 42 |
| 2021-01 | 43 |
| 2020-12 | 41 |
| 2020-10 | 39 |
| 2020-07 | 40 |
| 2020-06 | 38 |
| 2020-04 | 34 |
| 2020-02 | 30 |
| 2019-12 | 29 |
| 2019-09 | 30 |
| 2019-08 | 30 |
| 2019-06 | 33 |
| 2019-03 | 39 |
| 2019-01 | 40 |