Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN
Executive Summary
Cincinnati's housing market shows average risk, ranking 70th of 274 metros. The market recently entered Hypersupply. The market shows signs of liquidity stress with elevated inventory. Significant oversupply — conditions increasingly favor buyers over sellers.
Cincinnati experienced a market correction from early 2025 through mid-2025. Elevated inventory persists, suggesting the market hasn't fully normalized.
Inventory has surged +19% YoY with days on market up +16% — significant supply buildup indicating market stress.
Rent growth is roughly keeping pace with price appreciation, suggesting valuations are not stretched.
Cycle Phase
Building activity may be outpacing demand absorption
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by migration and permit growth, while affordability provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory has surged +19% YoY with days on market up +16% — significant supply buildup indicating market stress.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Oversupply with deteriorating transactions and no credit excuse. Supply-driven correction risk is elevated.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
SurgeRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Significant overbuilding into weak demand. This is the highest-risk metro combination — new supply is delivering into a market that is already struggling to absorb existing inventory.
Internal Structure
Cincinnati's 13 counties show moderate divergence — Clermont County carries the most risk (High Risk) while Boone County anchors the lower end.
Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN shows Moderate internal divergence — some counties diverge meaningfully from the metro picture. Clermont County contributes the most structural risk (High Risk, driven by permit growth), while Boone County anchors the lower end (Below Average).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Clermont CountyRisk Driver | 94 |
Warren County | 73 |
Hamilton County | 58 |
Dearborn County<5% | 56 |
Kenton County | 56 |
Franklin County<5% | 52 |
Campbell County<5% | 50 |
Pendleton CountyUnscored | 50 |
Bracken CountyUnscored | 50 |
Butler County | 48 |
Grant County<5% | 40 |
Boone CountyStabilizer | 38 |
Brown County<5% | 36 |
Gallatin County<5% | 31 |
Ohio County<5% | 18 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2026-05 | 58 |
| 2025-11 | 58 |
| 2025-09 | 57 |
| 2025-08 | 54 |
| 2025-06 | 52 |
| 2025-04 | 51 |
| 2025-02 | 57 |
| 2025-01 | 62 |
| 2024-11 | 56 |
| 2024-09 | 56 |
| 2024-07 | 60 |
| 2024-06 | 62 |
| 2024-04 | 61 |
| 2024-03 | 62 |
| 2024-01 | 62 |
| 2023-11 | 60 |
| 2023-09 | 59 |
| 2023-08 | 58 |
| 2023-06 | 56 |
| 2023-04 | 54 |
| 2023-02 | 51 |
| 2023-01 | 52 |
| 2022-11 | 52 |
| 2022-10 | 50 |
| 2022-08 | 51 |
| 2022-07 | 51 |
| 2022-05 | 52 |
| 2022-02 | 50 |
| 2021-12 | 48 |
| 2021-10 | 46 |
| 2021-09 | 48 |
| 2021-07 | 48 |
| 2021-04 | 44 |
| 2021-02 | 49 |
| 2020-12 | 52 |
| 2020-10 | 54 |
| 2020-09 | 55 |
| 2020-07 | 55 |
| 2020-06 | 54 |
| 2020-04 | 56 |
| 2020-03 | 55 |
| 2020-01 | 52 |
| 2019-10 | 53 |
| 2019-07 | 57 |
| 2019-04 | 52 |
| 2019-02 | 53 |
| 2019-01 | 53 |