Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN
Executive Summary
Chicago's housing market shows average risk, ranking 201st of 287 metros. The market recently entered Expansion. Current conditions are balanced with stable liquidity. Broad-based growth with healthy fundamentals.
Chicago has maintained relatively stable market conditions throughout the observation period, currently in Expansion.
Inventory is roughly flat (-1% YoY) with homes selling at a normal pace — a balanced market.
Rent growth is roughly keeping pace with price appreciation, suggesting valuations are not stretched.
Cycle Phase
Normal growth conditions with balanced fundamentals
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by migration and price momentum, while affordability provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory is roughly flat (-1% YoY) with homes selling at a normal pace — a balanced market.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Normal expansion. Credit is available, transactions are healthy — no constraints on current growth momentum.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
CoolingRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Builders are pulling back but demand remains healthy. A supply constraint could form — fewer new units entering a market that is still absorbing well.
Employment Concentration
Employment
Limited dataInternal Structure
Chicago's 13 counties show similar risk profiles — the metro-level score is broadly representative.
Chicago, IL-IN shows Low internal divergence — county-level differences are minor and the metro composite is broadly representative. DuPage County contributes the most structural risk (Elevated, driven by price momentum), while Lake County anchors the lower end (Average).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
McHenry County<5% | 75 |
DuPage CountyRisk Driver | 73 |
Kane County | 64 |
Will County | 62 |
Cook County | 56 |
Lake County | 56 |
Lake CountyStabilizer | 50 |
Kendall County<5% | 42 |
Grundy County<5% | 40 |
Porter County<5% | 36 |
Jasper County<5% | 35 |
DeKalb County<5% | 35 |
Newton County<5% | 25 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2025-11 | 54 |
| 2025-09 | 53 |
| 2025-06 | 56 |
| 2025-04 | 58 |
| 2025-01 | 56 |
| 2024-11 | 57 |
| 2024-10 | 55 |
| 2024-08 | 57 |
| 2024-05 | 57 |
| 2024-02 | 58 |
| 2023-11 | 55 |
| 2023-08 | 55 |
| 2023-06 | 50 |
| 2023-03 | 46 |
| 2023-02 | 46 |
| 2022-12 | 47 |
| 2022-11 | 45 |
| 2022-09 | 43 |
| 2022-08 | 42 |
| 2022-06 | 44 |
| 2022-03 | 41 |
| 2022-02 | 42 |
| 2021-12 | 40 |
| 2021-09 | 44 |
| 2021-07 | 44 |
| 2021-04 | 48 |
| 2021-03 | 48 |
| 2021-01 | 48 |
| 2020-12 | 48 |
| 2020-10 | 48 |
| 2020-08 | 47 |
| 2020-06 | 47 |
| 2020-03 | 47 |
| 2020-02 | 45 |
| 2019-12 | 47 |
| 2019-09 | 48 |
| 2019-07 | 48 |
| 2019-06 | 45 |
| 2019-04 | 47 |
| 2019-01 | 47 |