Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN
Cycle Phase
Chicago has maintained relatively stable market conditions throughout the observation period, currently in Expansion.
Normal growth conditions with balanced fundamentals
Chicago's housing market shows average risk, ranking 194th of 287 metros. The market recently entered Expansion. Current conditions are balanced with stable liquidity.
Executive Summary
Risk is Neutral, driven primarily by migration and price momentum. The market is in Expansion phase. Liquidity is stable and valuation is balanced.
Top Risk Drivers (This Month)
Market Signals
Inventory is roughly flat (-1% YoY) with homes selling at a normal pace — a balanced market.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
Factor Breakdown
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
Underlying Values
| Metric | Value | Pctile |
|---|---|---|
| Price Momentum | +4.1% | p80 |
| Permit Growth | -6.9% | p41 |
| Permits/1K Pop | 1.72 | p15 |
| Affordability | 0.17 | p1 |
| Employment | +0.6% | p36 |
| Net AGI Migration | -$7M | p99 |
National ContextDoes not affect score
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Normal expansion. Credit is available, transactions are healthy — no constraints on current growth momentum.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local SignalsDoes not affect score
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
CoolingRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Builders are pulling back but demand remains healthy. A supply constraint could form — fewer new units entering a market that is still absorbing well.
Liquidity
Liquidity
Internal Structure
Chicago's counties diverge significantly — DuPage County (High Risk) contrasts sharply with Kendall County, making the metro average potentially misleading.
Chicago, IL-IN shows High internal divergence — the metro composite may obscure significant county-level differences. DuPage County contributes the most structural risk (High Risk, driven by price momentum), while Kendall County anchors the lower end (Low Risk).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
DuPage CountyRisk Driver | 92 |
Cook County | 75 |
McHenry County | 70 |
Lake County | 64 |
Will County | 64 |
Kane County | 58 |
Lake County | 50 |
Grundy County | 45 |
Jasper County | 33 |
DeKalb County | 30 |
Porter County | 25 |
Kendall CountyStabilizer | 22 |
Newton County | 22 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2025-11 | 54 |
| 2025-09 | 53 |
| 2025-06 | 56 |
| 2025-04 | 58 |
| 2025-01 | 56 |
| 2024-11 | 57 |
| 2024-10 | 55 |
| 2024-08 | 57 |
| 2024-05 | 57 |
| 2024-02 | 58 |
| 2023-11 | 55 |
| 2023-08 | 55 |
| 2023-06 | 50 |
| 2023-03 | 46 |
| 2023-02 | 46 |
| 2022-12 | 47 |
| 2022-11 | 45 |
| 2022-09 | 43 |
| 2022-08 | 42 |
| 2022-06 | 44 |
| 2022-03 | 41 |
| 2022-02 | 42 |
| 2021-12 | 40 |
| 2021-09 | 44 |
| 2021-07 | 44 |
| 2021-04 | 48 |
| 2021-03 | 48 |
| 2021-01 | 48 |
| 2020-12 | 48 |
| 2020-10 | 48 |
| 2020-08 | 47 |
| 2020-06 | 47 |
| 2020-03 | 47 |
| 2020-02 | 45 |
| 2019-12 | 47 |
| 2019-09 | 48 |
| 2019-07 | 48 |
| 2019-06 | 45 |
| 2019-04 | 47 |
| 2019-01 | 47 |