Charleston-North Charleston, SC
Executive Summary
Charleston's housing market shows average risk, ranking 220th of 287 metros. The market recently entered Recovery. Inventory levels are elevated, warranting monitoring. Recovery underway but inventory still elevated — watch for follow-through.
Charleston experienced a market correction from late 2025 through late 2025. The market is currently recovering.
Inventory is elevated (+22% YoY) and days on market are up +10% — supply is building but not yet at stress levels.
Rent growth is roughly keeping pace with price appreciation, suggesting valuations are not stretched.
Cycle Phase
Market conditions are rebuilding after a correction period
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by affordability and permits per capita, while migration provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory is elevated (+22% YoY) and days on market are up +10% — supply is building but not yet at stress levels.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Early-stage recovery with lingering transaction weakness. Credit is available but buyer activity hasn't fully returned yet.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
Sharp CoolingRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Sharp building pullback with softening demand. Mixed signals — builders saw weakness early, but demand hasn't fully deteriorated yet.
Employment Concentration
Employment
DiversifiedInternal Structure
Charleston's 3 counties show moderate divergence — Charleston County carries the most risk (Elevated) while Dorchester County anchors the lower end.
Charleston, SC shows Moderate internal divergence — some counties diverge meaningfully from the metro picture. Charleston County contributes the most structural risk (Elevated, driven by price momentum), while Dorchester County anchors the lower end (Below Average).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Charleston CountyRisk Driver | 62 |
Berkeley County | 50 |
Dorchester CountyStabilizer | 38 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2025-11 | 47 |
| 2025-10 | 47 |
| 2025-08 | 49 |
| 2025-07 | 51 |
| 2025-05 | 48 |
| 2025-04 | 47 |
| 2025-02 | 56 |
| 2025-01 | 56 |
| 2024-12 | 53 |
| 2024-11 | 52 |
| 2024-09 | 49 |
| 2024-08 | 51 |
| 2024-06 | 56 |
| 2024-03 | 56 |
| 2024-01 | 55 |
| 2023-11 | 56 |
| 2023-09 | 54 |
| 2023-07 | 53 |
| 2023-06 | 52 |
| 2023-04 | 53 |
| 2023-03 | 54 |
| 2023-01 | 54 |
| 2022-10 | 54 |
| 2022-07 | 55 |
| 2022-06 | 55 |
| 2022-05 | 55 |
| 2022-03 | 56 |
| 2022-02 | 56 |
| 2021-12 | 57 |
| 2021-11 | 55 |
| 2021-09 | 53 |
| 2021-06 | 54 |
| 2021-05 | 55 |
| 2021-03 | 54 |
| 2020-12 | 53 |
| 2020-09 | 61 |
| 2020-06 | 58 |
| 2020-03 | 55 |
| 2019-12 | 49 |
| 2019-09 | 52 |
| 2019-06 | 54 |
| 2019-05 | 53 |
| 2019-03 | 49 |
| 2019-01 | 48 |