Champaign-Urbana, IL
Executive Summary
Champaign's housing market shows elevated risk, ranking 8th of 287 metros. The market recently entered Recession. The market shows signs of liquidity stress with elevated inventory. Deep correction with severe liquidity stress — significant risk remains.
Champaign has maintained relatively stable market conditions throughout the observation period, currently in Recession.
Inventory has surged +38% YoY with days on market up -5% — significant supply buildup indicating market stress.
Rent growth is roughly keeping pace with price appreciation, suggesting valuations are not stretched.
Cycle Phase
Demand contraction with rising inventory pressure
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by permit growth and migration, while affordability provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory has surged +38% YoY with days on market up -5% — significant supply buildup indicating market stress.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Active correction with weak transactions but available credit. Buyers can borrow — they're choosing not to at current prices.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
ElevatedRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Above-normal supply meeting deteriorating demand. Correction risk is rising — new units are entering a market where existing inventory is already building.
Employment Concentration
Employment
ModerateInternal Structure
Champaign's 3 counties show similar risk profiles — the metro-level score is broadly representative.
Champaign, IL shows Low internal divergence — county-level differences are minor and the metro composite is broadly representative. Ford County contributes the most structural risk (Average, driven by price momentum), while Champaign County anchors the lower end (Average).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Champaign CountyStabilizer | 50 |
Ford CountyRisk Driver | 50 |
Piatt County | 50 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2025-11 | 66 |
| 2025-09 | 64 |
| 2025-08 | 59 |
| 2025-06 | 56 |
| 2025-05 | 49 |
| 2025-03 | 43 |
| 2025-01 | 58 |
| 2024-11 | 54 |
| 2024-08 | 64 |
| 2024-07 | 64 |
| 2024-05 | 56 |
| 2024-04 | 52 |
| 2024-03 | 63 |
| 2024-01 | 64 |
| 2023-10 | 58 |
| 2023-08 | 54 |
| 2023-06 | 53 |
| 2023-04 | 60 |
| 2023-02 | 48 |
| 2022-12 | 54 |
| 2022-10 | 42 |
| 2022-09 | 48 |
| 2022-07 | 41 |
| 2022-04 | 40 |
| 2022-02 | 38 |
| 2021-12 | 38 |
| 2021-11 | 38 |
| 2021-09 | 42 |
| 2021-06 | 44 |
| 2021-05 | 44 |
| 2021-03 | 39 |
| 2021-02 | 39 |
| 2020-12 | 41 |
| 2020-11 | 41 |
| 2020-09 | 38 |
| 2020-06 | 39 |
| 2020-04 | 35 |
| 2020-03 | 35 |
| 2020-01 | 34 |
| 2019-11 | 38 |
| 2019-09 | 42 |
| 2019-06 | 40 |
| 2019-04 | 46 |
| 2019-03 | 46 |
| 2019-01 | 45 |