Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA
Executive Summary
Blacksburg's housing market shows elevated risk, ranking 1st of 273 metros. The market recently entered Recession. The market shows signs of liquidity stress with elevated inventory. Deep correction with severe liquidity stress — significant risk remains.
Blacksburg experienced a market correction from late 2024 through late 2024.
Inventory has surged +30% YoY with days on market up +25% — significant supply buildup indicating market stress.
Rent growth is roughly keeping pace with price appreciation, suggesting valuations are not stretched.
Cycle Phase
Demand contraction with rising inventory pressure
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by employment and permit growth, while permits per capita provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory has surged +30% YoY with days on market up +25% — significant supply buildup indicating market stress.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Active correction with weak transactions but available credit. Buyers can borrow — they're choosing not to at current prices.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Employment Concentration
Employment
Limited dataInternal Structure
Blacksburg's 5 counties show moderate divergence — Pulaski County carries the most risk (Elevated) while Radford city anchors the lower end.
Blacksburg, VA shows Moderate internal divergence — some counties diverge meaningfully from the metro picture. Pulaski County contributes the most structural risk (Elevated, driven by price momentum), while Radford city anchors the lower end (Low Risk).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Pulaski CountyRisk Driver | 75 |
Floyd County | 62 |
Montgomery County | 62 |
Giles County | 31 |
Radford cityStabilizer | 19 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2026-06 | 78 |
| 2026-05 | 80 |
| 2025-12 | 72 |
| 2025-10 | 65 |
| 2025-08 | 58 |
| 2025-07 | 63 |
| 2025-05 | 58 |
| 2025-03 | 56 |
| 2025-01 | 58 |
| 2024-11 | 59 |
| 2024-09 | 66 |
| 2024-07 | 61 |
| 2024-06 | 57 |
| 2024-04 | 50 |
| 2024-03 | 50 |
| 2024-01 | 49 |
| 2023-11 | 50 |
| 2023-09 | 48 |
| 2023-07 | 53 |
| 2023-05 | 65 |
| 2023-03 | 56 |
| 2023-02 | 54 |
| 2023-01 | 58 |
| 2022-11 | 43 |
| 2022-10 | 43 |
| 2022-09 | 52 |
| 2022-07 | 50 |
| 2022-06 | 40 |
| 2022-04 | 42 |
| 2022-02 | 40 |
| 2022-01 | 46 |
| 2021-11 | 52 |
| 2021-10 | 45 |
| 2021-08 | 44 |
| 2021-05 | 44 |
| 2021-04 | 47 |
| 2021-02 | 48 |
| 2020-12 | 45 |
| 2020-10 | 43 |
| 2020-09 | 48 |
| 2020-07 | 50 |
| 2020-04 | 54 |
| 2020-02 | 58 |
| 2019-11 | 63 |
| 2019-08 | 50 |
| 2019-06 | 52 |
| 2019-03 | 48 |
| 2019-01 | 54 |