Birmingham, AL
Cycle Phase
Birmingham experienced a market correction from mid-2024 through mid-2024. The market has since normalized and entered Expansion.
Normal growth conditions with balanced fundamentals
Birmingham's housing market shows average risk, ranking 137th of 287 metros. The market has been in Expansion for 5 months. Inventory is growing moderately (+12% YoY) with stable liquidity.
Executive Summary
Risk is Neutral, driven primarily by migration and permit growth. The market is in Expansion phase. Liquidity is stable and valuation is balanced.
Top Risk Drivers (This Month)
Market Signals
Inventory is growing at a moderate +12% pace with homes taking +4% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
Factor Breakdown
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
Underlying Values
| Metric | Value | Pctile |
|---|---|---|
| Price Momentum | +1.5% | p34 |
| Permit Growth | +12.9% | p74 |
| Permits/1K Pop | 3.58 | p47 |
| Affordability | 0.24 | p22 |
| Employment | +0.6% | p36 |
| Net AGI Migration | -$138K | p89 |
National ContextDoes not affect score
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Normal expansion. Credit is available, transactions are healthy — no constraints on current growth momentum.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local SignalsDoes not affect score
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
ElevatedRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Above-normal building activity with healthy demand. Balanced expansion — the market is absorbing new supply without stress.
Liquidity
Liquidity
Internal Structure
Birmingham's 7 counties show moderate divergence — St. Clair County carries the most risk (Elevated) while Walker County anchors the lower end.
Birmingham, AL shows Moderate internal divergence — some counties diverge meaningfully from the metro picture. St. Clair County contributes the most structural risk (Elevated, driven by permit growth), while Walker County anchors the lower end (Low Risk).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
St. Clair CountyRisk Driver | 72 |
Jefferson County | 61 |
Bibb County | 61 |
Blount County | 56 |
Shelby County | 44 |
Chilton County | 39 |
Walker CountyStabilizer | 17 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2025-11 | 47 |
| 2025-09 | 49 |
| 2025-07 | 55 |
| 2025-05 | 60 |
| 2025-04 | 54 |
| 2025-02 | 54 |
| 2025-01 | 54 |
| 2024-12 | 56 |
| 2024-10 | 57 |
| 2024-07 | 53 |
| 2024-06 | 52 |
| 2024-04 | 51 |
| 2024-03 | 53 |
| 2024-01 | 52 |
| 2023-12 | 54 |
| 2023-10 | 52 |
| 2023-08 | 51 |
| 2023-06 | 55 |
| 2023-04 | 54 |
| 2023-01 | 57 |
| 2022-11 | 57 |
| 2022-08 | 57 |
| 2022-06 | 53 |
| 2022-05 | 53 |
| 2022-03 | 55 |
| 2021-12 | 56 |
| 2021-10 | 54 |
| 2021-09 | 51 |
| 2021-07 | 52 |
| 2021-05 | 56 |
| 2021-03 | 48 |
| 2021-01 | 49 |
| 2020-11 | 52 |
| 2020-09 | 56 |
| 2020-07 | 57 |
| 2020-05 | 55 |
| 2020-03 | 57 |
| 2020-02 | 57 |
| 2019-12 | 54 |
| 2019-11 | 55 |
| 2019-09 | 54 |
| 2019-07 | 50 |
| 2019-05 | 51 |
| 2019-04 | 51 |
| 2019-02 | 53 |
| 2019-01 | 54 |