Birmingham, AL
Executive Summary
Birmingham's housing market shows average risk, ranking 116th of 274 metros. The market recently entered Expansion. Current conditions are balanced with stable liquidity. Broad-based growth with healthy fundamentals.
Birmingham experienced a market correction from mid-2024 through mid-2024. The market has since normalized and entered Expansion.
Inventory is growing at a moderate +8% pace with homes taking +6% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Rent growth is roughly keeping pace with price appreciation, suggesting valuations are not stretched.
Cycle Phase
Normal growth conditions with balanced fundamentals
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by migration and permit growth, while affordability provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory is growing at a moderate +8% pace with homes taking +6% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Normal expansion. Credit is available, transactions are healthy — no constraints on current growth momentum.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
SurgeRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Permit activity is surging and demand is absorbing it. Both sides of the market are running hot — monitor for overheating if liquidity shifts.
Employment Concentration
Employment
ConcentratedInternal Structure
Birmingham's 7 counties show moderate divergence — Shelby County carries the most risk (High Risk) while Walker County anchors the lower end.
Birmingham, AL shows Moderate internal divergence — some counties diverge meaningfully from the metro picture. Shelby County contributes the most structural risk (High Risk, driven by permits per capita), while Walker County anchors the lower end (Below Average).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Shelby CountyRisk Driver | 87 |
Jefferson County | 71 |
St. Clair County | 58 |
Chilton County<5% | 42 |
Blount County | 42 |
Walker CountyStabilizer | 42 |
Bibb County<5% | 8 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2025-12 | 53 |
| 2025-10 | 46 |
| 2025-07 | 55 |
| 2025-05 | 60 |
| 2025-04 | 54 |
| 2025-02 | 54 |
| 2025-01 | 54 |
| 2024-12 | 56 |
| 2024-10 | 57 |
| 2024-07 | 53 |
| 2024-06 | 52 |
| 2024-04 | 51 |
| 2024-03 | 53 |
| 2024-01 | 52 |
| 2023-12 | 54 |
| 2023-10 | 52 |
| 2023-08 | 51 |
| 2023-06 | 55 |
| 2023-04 | 54 |
| 2023-01 | 57 |
| 2022-11 | 57 |
| 2022-08 | 57 |
| 2022-06 | 53 |
| 2022-05 | 53 |
| 2022-03 | 55 |
| 2021-12 | 56 |
| 2021-10 | 54 |
| 2021-09 | 51 |
| 2021-07 | 52 |
| 2021-05 | 56 |
| 2021-03 | 48 |
| 2021-01 | 49 |
| 2020-11 | 52 |
| 2020-09 | 56 |
| 2020-07 | 57 |
| 2020-05 | 55 |
| 2020-03 | 57 |
| 2020-02 | 57 |
| 2019-12 | 54 |
| 2019-11 | 55 |
| 2019-09 | 54 |
| 2019-07 | 50 |
| 2019-05 | 51 |
| 2019-04 | 51 |
| 2019-02 | 53 |
| 2019-01 | 54 |