Birmingham, AL
Executive Summary
Birmingham's housing market shows average risk, ranking 89th of 287 metros. The market has been in Expansion for 5 months. Inventory is growing moderately (+12% YoY) with stable liquidity. Broad-based growth with healthy fundamentals.
Birmingham experienced a market correction from mid-2024 through mid-2024. The market has since normalized and entered Expansion.
Inventory is growing at a moderate +12% pace with homes taking +4% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Rent growth is roughly keeping pace with price appreciation, suggesting valuations are not stretched.
Cycle Phase
Normal growth conditions with balanced fundamentals
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by migration and permit growth, while affordability provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory is growing at a moderate +12% pace with homes taking +4% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Normal expansion. Credit is available, transactions are healthy — no constraints on current growth momentum.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
ElevatedRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Above-normal building activity with healthy demand. Balanced expansion — the market is absorbing new supply without stress.
Employment Concentration
Employment
ConcentratedInternal Structure
Birmingham's 7 counties show moderate divergence — St. Clair County carries the most risk (High Risk) while Walker County anchors the lower end.
Birmingham, AL shows Moderate internal divergence — some counties diverge meaningfully from the metro picture. St. Clair County contributes the most structural risk (High Risk, driven by permits per capita), while Walker County anchors the lower end (Low Risk).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
St. Clair CountyRisk Driver | 79 |
Jefferson County | 63 |
Bibb County<5% | 58 |
Shelby County | 54 |
Blount County | 42 |
Chilton County<5% | 33 |
Walker CountyStabilizer | 21 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2025-11 | 47 |
| 2025-09 | 49 |
| 2025-07 | 55 |
| 2025-05 | 60 |
| 2025-04 | 54 |
| 2025-02 | 54 |
| 2025-01 | 54 |
| 2024-12 | 56 |
| 2024-10 | 57 |
| 2024-07 | 53 |
| 2024-06 | 52 |
| 2024-04 | 51 |
| 2024-03 | 53 |
| 2024-01 | 52 |
| 2023-12 | 54 |
| 2023-10 | 52 |
| 2023-08 | 51 |
| 2023-06 | 55 |
| 2023-04 | 54 |
| 2023-01 | 57 |
| 2022-11 | 57 |
| 2022-08 | 57 |
| 2022-06 | 53 |
| 2022-05 | 53 |
| 2022-03 | 55 |
| 2021-12 | 56 |
| 2021-10 | 54 |
| 2021-09 | 51 |
| 2021-07 | 52 |
| 2021-05 | 56 |
| 2021-03 | 48 |
| 2021-01 | 49 |
| 2020-11 | 52 |
| 2020-09 | 56 |
| 2020-07 | 57 |
| 2020-05 | 55 |
| 2020-03 | 57 |
| 2020-02 | 57 |
| 2019-12 | 54 |
| 2019-11 | 55 |
| 2019-09 | 54 |
| 2019-07 | 50 |
| 2019-05 | 51 |
| 2019-04 | 51 |
| 2019-02 | 53 |
| 2019-01 | 54 |