Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX
Executive Summary
Beaumont's housing market shows average risk, ranking 116th of 274 metros. The market recently entered Recovery. Inventory is growing moderately (-13% YoY) with stable liquidity. Early signs of stabilization — conditions may favor patient buyers.
Beaumont experienced a market correction from mid-2024 through mid-2024. The market is currently recovering.
Inventory is declining (-13% YoY), indicating a tight market with limited supply.
Rent growth is roughly keeping pace with price appreciation, suggesting valuations are not stretched.
Cycle Phase
Market conditions are rebuilding after a correction period
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by price momentum and migration, while permits per capita provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory is declining (-13% YoY), indicating a tight market with limited supply.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Healthy recovery. Credit is flowing normally and transactions are steady — conditions favor continued rebuilding.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
NormalRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Supply and demand are in equilibrium. No unusual activity on either side of the market.
Employment Concentration
Employment
ModerateInternal Structure
Beaumont's 3 counties show moderate divergence — Hardin County carries the most risk (Elevated) while Jefferson County anchors the lower end.
Beaumont, TX shows Moderate internal divergence — some counties diverge meaningfully from the metro picture. Hardin County contributes the most structural risk (Elevated, driven by price momentum), while Jefferson County anchors the lower end (Below Average).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Hardin CountyRisk Driver | 75 |
Jefferson CountyStabilizer | 38 |
Orange County | 38 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2025-12 | 43 |
| 2025-11 | 35 |
| 2025-09 | 41 |
| 2025-08 | 37 |
| 2025-06 | 46 |
| 2025-05 | 46 |
| 2025-03 | 48 |
| 2025-02 | 42 |
| 2024-12 | 34 |
| 2024-11 | 39 |
| 2024-10 | 43 |
| 2024-08 | 37 |
| 2024-06 | 30 |
| 2024-05 | 31 |
| 2024-04 | 32 |
| 2024-03 | 44 |
| 2024-01 | 40 |
| 2023-10 | 35 |
| 2023-09 | 35 |
| 2023-07 | 36 |
| 2023-06 | 35 |
| 2023-04 | 35 |
| 2023-02 | 38 |
| 2023-01 | 36 |
| 2022-11 | 37 |
| 2022-09 | 33 |
| 2022-06 | 35 |
| 2022-04 | 40 |
| 2022-02 | 40 |
| 2022-01 | 45 |
| 2021-11 | 46 |
| 2021-08 | 46 |
| 2021-07 | 46 |
| 2021-05 | 45 |
| 2021-04 | 45 |
| 2021-02 | 46 |
| 2020-11 | 46 |
| 2020-09 | 54 |
| 2020-08 | 52 |
| 2020-06 | 54 |
| 2020-05 | 51 |
| 2020-03 | 50 |
| 2019-12 | 42 |
| 2019-09 | 46 |
| 2019-06 | 52 |
| 2019-04 | 52 |
| 2019-02 | 48 |
| 2019-01 | 48 |