Amarillo, TX
Executive Summary
Amarillo's housing market shows below-average risk, ranking 234th of 287 metros. The market has been in Recovery for 7 months. Inventory is growing moderately (-13% YoY) with stable liquidity. Early signs of stabilization — conditions may favor patient buyers.
Amarillo experienced a market correction from late 2023 through early 2024. The market is currently recovering.
Inventory is declining (-13% YoY), indicating a tight market with limited supply.
Rent growth is roughly keeping pace with price appreciation, suggesting valuations are not stretched.
Cycle Phase
Market conditions are rebuilding after a correction period
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by permits per capita and permit growth, while employment provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory is declining (-13% YoY), indicating a tight market with limited supply.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Healthy recovery. Credit is flowing normally and transactions are steady — conditions favor continued rebuilding.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
NormalRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Supply and demand are in equilibrium. No unusual activity on either side of the market.
Employment Concentration
Employment
Limited dataInternal Structure
Amarillo's 3 counties show moderate divergence — Potter County carries the most risk (Elevated) while Randall County anchors the lower end.
Amarillo, TX shows Moderate internal divergence — some counties diverge meaningfully from the metro picture. Potter County contributes the most structural risk (Elevated, driven by permit growth), while Randall County anchors the lower end (Low Risk).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Potter CountyRisk Driver | 75 |
Armstrong CountyUnscored | 50 |
Carson County<5% | 50 |
Oldham CountyUnscored | 50 |
Randall CountyStabilizer | 25 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2025-11 | 53 |
| 2025-09 | 50 |
| 2025-06 | 46 |
| 2025-05 | 47 |
| 2025-03 | 51 |
| 2025-02 | 48 |
| 2025-01 | 50 |
| 2024-12 | 49 |
| 2024-10 | 45 |
| 2024-07 | 53 |
| 2024-04 | 49 |
| 2024-01 | 51 |
| 2023-11 | 55 |
| 2023-09 | 54 |
| 2023-07 | 58 |
| 2023-04 | 64 |
| 2023-02 | 60 |
| 2022-11 | 60 |
| 2022-09 | 59 |
| 2022-07 | 60 |
| 2022-06 | 59 |
| 2022-04 | 54 |
| 2022-01 | 64 |
| 2021-10 | 58 |
| 2021-07 | 62 |
| 2021-04 | 57 |
| 2021-02 | 48 |
| 2021-01 | 48 |
| 2020-11 | 48 |
| 2020-10 | 48 |
| 2020-08 | 45 |
| 2020-07 | 46 |
| 2020-05 | 47 |
| 2020-04 | 50 |
| 2020-02 | 55 |
| 2019-11 | 53 |
| 2019-08 | 55 |
| 2019-05 | 52 |
| 2019-04 | 52 |
| 2019-02 | 58 |
| 2019-01 | 61 |