Albuquerque, NM
Executive Summary
Albuquerque's housing market shows average risk, ranking 211th of 274 metros. The market recently entered Recovery. Current conditions are balanced with stable liquidity. Early signs of stabilization — conditions may favor patient buyers.
Albuquerque experienced a market correction from mid-2025 through late 2025. The market is currently recovering.
Inventory is declining (-7% YoY), indicating a tight market with limited supply.
Rent growth is roughly keeping pace with price appreciation, suggesting valuations are not stretched.
Cycle Phase
Market conditions are rebuilding after a correction period
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by employment and migration, while affordability provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory is declining (-7% YoY), indicating a tight market with limited supply.
Liquidity
Valuation
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Healthy recovery. Credit is flowing normally and transactions are steady — conditions favor continued rebuilding.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
Sharp CoolingRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Significant supply pullback into healthy demand. A supply constraint is forming — pricing power is shifting to existing inventory holders.
Employment Concentration
Employment
ConcentratedInternal Structure
Albuquerque's 3 counties show moderate divergence — Bernalillo County carries the most risk (Elevated) while Sandoval County anchors the lower end.
Albuquerque, NM shows Moderate internal divergence — some counties diverge meaningfully from the metro picture. Bernalillo County contributes the most structural risk (Elevated, driven by permit growth), while Sandoval County anchors the lower end (Below Average).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Bernalillo CountyRisk Driver | 62 |
Torrance CountyUnscored | 50 |
Valencia County | 50 |
Sandoval CountyStabilizer | 38 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2026-05 | 45 |
| 2025-11 | 40 |
| 2025-10 | 34 |
| 2025-08 | 35 |
| 2025-06 | 37 |
| 2025-05 | 36 |
| 2025-04 | 37 |
| 2025-02 | 38 |
| 2025-01 | 38 |
| 2024-11 | 36 |
| 2024-08 | 37 |
| 2024-05 | 42 |
| 2024-03 | 39 |
| 2024-02 | 37 |
| 2024-01 | 38 |
| 2023-11 | 44 |
| 2023-08 | 43 |
| 2023-06 | 39 |
| 2023-05 | 41 |
| 2023-03 | 45 |
| 2023-01 | 42 |
| 2022-11 | 44 |
| 2022-08 | 40 |
| 2022-06 | 43 |
| 2022-05 | 41 |
| 2022-03 | 39 |
| 2022-01 | 37 |
| 2021-11 | 40 |
| 2021-10 | 41 |
| 2021-08 | 42 |
| 2021-05 | 45 |
| 2021-04 | 50 |
| 2021-02 | 52 |
| 2020-12 | 47 |
| 2020-10 | 46 |
| 2020-08 | 45 |
| 2020-06 | 43 |
| 2020-05 | 43 |
| 2020-03 | 38 |
| 2020-02 | 41 |
| 2019-12 | 41 |
| 2019-11 | 40 |
| 2019-09 | 41 |
| 2019-06 | 41 |
| 2019-05 | 39 |
| 2019-03 | 34 |
| 2019-01 | 38 |