Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY
Executive Summary
Albany's housing market shows below-average risk, ranking 239th of 274 metros. The market recently entered Recovery. Current conditions are balanced with stable liquidity. Early signs of stabilization — conditions may favor patient buyers.
Albany experienced a market correction from mid-2025 through mid-2025. The market is currently recovering.
Inventory is growing at a moderate +8% pace with homes taking -5% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Cycle Phase
Market conditions are rebuilding after a correction period
Key Dynamics
Risk is primarily driven by price momentum and migration, while permit growth provides the most support.
Top Drivers
Market Signals
Inventory is growing at a moderate +8% pace with homes taking -5% longer to sell — within normal ranges.
Liquidity
Factor Details
12-month HPI change — higher = overheating
YoY permit change — higher = supply pressure
Permits per 1,000 residents — higher = overbuilding risk
Mortgage payment / income — higher = more burdened
12-month employment change (risk inverted)
Net AGI migration (risk inverted)
National Context
Credit Conditions
Credit Regime
Healthy recovery. Credit is flowing normally and transactions are steady — conditions favor continued rebuilding.
Supply Pipeline
Supply Regime
Supply pipeline is building up while credit remains available. New units are accumulating in the system — watch for delivery pressure in coming quarters.
Local Signals
Metro Permit Activity
Permit Activity
Sharp CoolingRaw signal — not the composite percentile
Relative to 2016–2019 norms for this metro
Significant supply pullback into healthy demand. A supply constraint is forming — pricing power is shifting to existing inventory holders.
Employment Concentration
Employment
ModerateInternal Structure
Albany's counties diverge significantly — Saratoga County (Elevated) contrasts sharply with Schenectady County, making the metro average potentially misleading.
Albany, NY shows High internal divergence — the metro composite may obscure significant county-level differences. Saratoga County contributes the most structural risk (Elevated, driven by permits per capita), while Schenectady County anchors the lower end (Low Risk).
| County | Score ▼ |
|---|---|
Saratoga CountyRisk Driver | 75 |
Albany County | 62 |
Rensselaer County | 56 |
Schoharie County<5% | 44 |
Schenectady CountyStabilizer | 12 |
Score History
| Month | Score |
|---|---|
| 2026-05 | 43 |
| 2025-11 | 52 |
| 2025-09 | 55 |
| 2025-08 | 52 |
| 2025-07 | 53 |
| 2025-05 | 54 |
| 2025-04 | 55 |
| 2025-02 | 58 |
| 2025-01 | 58 |
| 2024-11 | 55 |
| 2024-08 | 57 |
| 2024-07 | 54 |
| 2024-05 | 59 |
| 2024-02 | 58 |
| 2023-11 | 61 |
| 2023-08 | 62 |
| 2023-07 | 60 |
| 2023-05 | 54 |
| 2023-03 | 50 |
| 2023-01 | 50 |
| 2022-11 | 58 |
| 2022-09 | 52 |
| 2022-08 | 46 |
| 2022-06 | 45 |
| 2022-03 | 47 |
| 2022-02 | 47 |
| 2021-12 | 36 |
| 2021-09 | 42 |
| 2021-07 | 40 |
| 2021-04 | 35 |
| 2021-03 | 46 |
| 2021-01 | 48 |
| 2020-12 | 46 |
| 2020-10 | 44 |
| 2020-09 | 40 |
| 2020-07 | 42 |
| 2020-04 | 42 |
| 2020-01 | 38 |
| 2019-11 | 41 |
| 2019-09 | 40 |
| 2019-08 | 39 |
| 2019-06 | 40 |
| 2019-04 | 39 |
| 2019-02 | 41 |
| 2019-01 | 38 |